I heard the GPUs are soldered to the motherboard, which is why they gave me a choice of motherboard replacement or full laptop replacement when mine arrived with a bad GPU.
-
you will have to change the whole board, the cpu and gpu are both solderd on the board.
-
Just what I though, from this point of view I could get an ASUS ROG already configured with a GTX 980M for less, which also has a BGA CPU/GPU combo. This MacBook generation really grinds my gears. Thanks guys.
Last edited: Feb 7, 2016Papusan likes this. -
-
Does anybody experience the new Nvidia driver 361.75 is causing Bad_pool_header ? And when I set PTS to High performance Nvidia processor, the software doesn't work anymore. I'm using latest Intel driver from Dell. -
sagarbhathwar Notebook Consultant
The earlier version to this also caused (I think 361.58) kernel_security_check_failure. Really wonder if we paid several dollars to get our face smacked with BSOD's
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk -
-
Strange, I'm on 361.75 and I've never had any issues yet. Played Diablo 3 in 4k for a couple of hours straight a few times and haven't had a crash. Even have my fans manually turned down so they aren't as loud (which leads to higher temps).
-
soulvengeance Notebook Consultant
No problems here, I'm on 361.75 also. I don't have a 4k panel though.
-
-
Last edited: Feb 9, 2016
-
Every time that a new OS is released there are drive stability issues. it's nothing new. Video stack changed so drivers have to be changed to work with it again and then stability has to be achieved again. AMD has the same issues.
Welcome to every OS upgrade since 1995. You really sound like a kid that has 0 actual knowledge. Hell parts of your post were barely legible.Gamespy and soulvengeance like this. -
soulvengeance Notebook Consultant
Gamespy likes this. -
You are perhaps one of the few on this or other forum who has tremendous knowledge about everything. Wish you had it... But I will not go into this topic. Maybe you should become a little more humble and not talk **** about people who have other opinion than you in the forum. But this is maybe too much to expect.
Last edited: Feb 9, 2016 -
After three failed motherboard replacements, alienware has decided to offer me a system exchange. Do they still have 17 r2's laying around?
-
-
Edit: If it matters, I'm using the latest Dell-provided Intel driver instead of the one from Interl's web site. -
hey guys, i wanna ask for some help about my brand new 17 R3 ( 6820hk + 16gb ram + gtx 980m 8GB). I have a friend who own a MSI GT72 ( 4710hq + 16 gb ram+ gtx 980m 8gb ) and he asked me to run some benchs just to realize if worth upgrade his laptop to the skylake version of MSI GT72. and after the benchs at same config and resolution , his laptop score was very higher than mine....according to the pics :
alienware 17 R3
MSI GT72
I was expecting something very close.... double check and repeat the benchs with the laptops side by side ....both on performance energy mode and plugged to the energy. any ideas ? thanks! -
EDIT: I have ambient occlusion set to quality, anisotropic filtering set to 16x, antialiasing transparency set to 2x supersample, and triple buffering set to on. This probably lowers my scores. I'll try again tomorrow with default settings.
I get even worse scores for Heaven but better for Valley. Could be that I accidentally left Task Manager running for Heaven.
Heaven:
Last edited: Feb 12, 2016 -
-
[QUOTE=" All later Aw models have delivered inferior bench scores results vs other brand with similar hardware. This is nothing new.[/QUOTE]
ty for the reply, im new in AW laptops and ive never been noticed about this. I was worried about if my laptop was deffective... -
-
Jarbas Almeida said: ↑[QUOTE=" All later Aw models have delivered inferior bench scores results vs other brand with similar hardware. This is nothing new.Click to expand...
Ya but not like +15% +30% of performance in favor of the msi
Check if you are
-running the very same graphic options in the benchmark
- running at the same clocks frequency than your friends / if your friend did on OC
- running your laptop with a 240W powersupply -
ufomammut said: ↑ty for the reply, im new in AW laptops and ive never been noticed about this. I was worried about if my laptop was deffective...
Check if you are
-running the very same graphic options in the benchmark
- running at the same clocks frequency than your friends / if your friend did on OC
- running your laptop with a 240W powersupplyClick to expand...
7% lower 3dmark11 score than a hefty down throttled burning hot super slim Gigabyte P35X v5.
Last edited: Feb 12, 2016 -
Papusan said: ↑Review of Gigabyte P35X v3. Test released today... See the result ↓↓↓ Where is newest Aw with Skylake on the rewiew list?
7% lower 3dmark11 score than a hefty down throttled burning hot super slim Gigabyte P35X v5.
View attachment 131822 View attachment 131823Click to expand... -
Sure it is sad.
There is still a bit of weird things with the notebook check tests.
When the guys stated that with the A15 the performance of the 980m dropped from 60 to 30fps under battery... comon it is an option to save battery that can be disable in geforce experience
Same with furemark it is natively recognize by nvidia card and cause throttle.
Regarding the difference of 30% in performance that jabas observed. It sounds like one gpu is OC. I cannot remember what is a normal score for a 980m with valley. -
ufomammut said: ↑Sure it is sad.
There is still a bit of weird things with the notebook check tests.
When the guys stated that with the A15 the performance of the 980m dropped from 60 to 30fps under battery... comon it is an option to save battery that can be disable in geforce experience
Same with furemark it is natively recognize by nvidia card and cause throttle.
Regarding the difference of 30% in performance that jabas observed. It sounds like one gpu is OC. I cannot remember what is a normal score for a 980m with valley.Click to expand...
7% lower benchmark score is nevertheless very much on the same hardware. A driver does not have such big effect.Last edited: Feb 12, 2016 -
Papusan said: ↑Yes it's sad. You think something is weird in their tests? All tests done by Notebook check has shown similar tendency for AW laptops. Always lowest scores. Even former socket Aw models have shown the same... Lower benchmark scores than other brand's similar models. Interpret this as you will.
7% lower benchmark score is nevertheless very much on the same hardware. A driver does not have such big effect.Click to expand...
But a measurement should not be published a without replications and evaluation of the dispersion. What is the relative standard deviation of the score of the benchmark? -
ufomammut said: ↑ty for the reply, im new in AW laptops and ive never been noticed about this. I was worried about if my laptop was deffective...Click to expand...
Check if you are
-running the very same graphic options in the benchmark
- running at the same clocks frequency than your friends / if your friend did on OC
- running your laptop with a 240W powersupply[/QUOTE]
ive double checked the profile and its the same, the clocks were checked with GPUZ , and my laptop came with a 240w power supply.
ufomammut said: ↑Sure it is sad.
There is still a bit of weird things with the notebook check tests.
When the guys stated that with the A15 the performance of the 980m dropped from 60 to 30fps under battery... comon it is an option to save battery that can be disable in geforce experience
Same with furemark it is natively recognize by nvidia card and cause throttle.
Regarding the difference of 30% in performance that jabas observed. It sounds like one gpu is OC. I cannot remember what is a normal score for a 980m with valley.Click to expand... -
Also, go into bios and see if you have cpu performance mode turned on.
Also, having owned msi before my aw17r3, msi and especially Asus have dynamic gpu over clocking built in. Makes a big difference.
My thoughts, play a game like cod or something with identical graphic settings, turn on fps monitoring, and compare your 2 laptops 'actual' performance differences. Synthetics aren't a good measure, to many factors come into play.
I'm sure aw will still be below msi. But personally, I'm ok with that. The msi is a very nice and solid machine, but I love my aw 100% better than I did the msi. Other than straight up gaming, I feel the aw has a huge advantage. Battery, look, feel, screen, fact fans turn off while not needed, etc.
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk -
dblkk said: ↑Also, go into bios and see if you have cpu performance mode turned on.Click to expand...
-
Jarbas Almeida said: ↑it was turned off ....now its on. thanks for the tip... about the difference...i gonna live with that....i love my AW too....Click to expand...
I use mine as a workstation more than gaming. But at more than $1500 less than the Dell precision (granted 970m vs m3000m). It's a great laptop, and games well. Can only imagine the 6820 and 980m are even better for gaming.
But that UHD screen, sooo nice. Best screen (tv/laptop/monitor/cell) I've ever seen. And I only use it for resolution to see more, haven't used any media above 720p. Still gorgeous. -
ran firestrike , and my laptop scores 1000 points less than other 17 R3 with same cpu, gpu, system and cores...im freaking out....i did a clean windows instalation with no better resultsClick to expand...
-
New results on my 17 R3 with stock nVidia settings
Edit: Still lower than the MSI. CPU performance mode is on. Could be due to Dell software, or the fact that the video has to go through the Intel GPU to get to the screen, or the MSI could be tweaked somehow. What GPU temps does your MSI friend get during the test? I get around 71C.
Unigine Heaven Benchmark 4.0
FPS: 85.9
Score: 2164
Min FPS: 17.1
Max FPS: 178.9
System
Platform: Windows NT 6.2 (build 9200) 64bit
CPU model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6820HK CPU @ 2.70GHz (2711MHz) x4
GPU model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M 10.18.13.6175/Intel(R) HD Graphics 530 20.19.15.4312 (4095MB) x1
Settings
Render: Direct3D11
Mode: 1920x1080 fullscreen
Preset Custom
Quality High
Tessellation: Disabled
Powered by UNIGINE Engine
Unigine Corp. © 2005-2013Click to expand...Unigine Valley Benchmark 1.0
FPS: 83.5
Score: 3493
Min FPS: 30.7
Max FPS: 135.4
System
Platform: Windows 8 (build 9200) 64bit
CPU model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6820HK CPU @ 2.70GHz (2711MHz) x4
GPU model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M 10.18.13.6175/Intel(R) HD Graphics 530 20.19.15.4312 (4095MB) x1
Settings
Render: Direct3D11
Mode: 1920x1080 fullscreen
Preset Custom
Quality High
Powered by UNIGINE Engine
Unigine Corp. © 2005-2013Click to expand... -
HunterZ0 said: ↑New results on my 17 R3 with stock nVidia settings
Edit: Still lower than the MSI. CPU performance mode is on. Could be due to Dell software, or the fact that the video has to go through the Intel GPU to get to the screen, or the MSI could be tweaked somehow. What GPU temps does your MSI friend get during the test? I get around 71C.Click to expand... -
HunterZ0 said: ↑New results on my 17 R3 with stock nVidia settings
Edit: Still lower than the MSI. CPU performance mode is on. Could be due to Dell software, or the fact that the video has to go through the Intel GPU to get to the screen, or the MSI could be tweaked somehow. What GPU temps does your MSI friend get during the test? I get around 71C.Click to expand... -
sluggz said: ↑correct me if I'm wrong , but doesn't the 6820hk turbo to 3.6 without over locking? Your cpu shows 2.7 which is the stock non turbo clockClick to expand...
The MSI screenshots show 2.5.
I don't think tools/benchmarks usually report the turbo speed?
With BIOS OC level 3, CPU-Z shows me idling at 3.9-4.0GHz (with a max possible of 4.1). I'll switch back to performance=enabled and OC=disabled and edit my post with the CPU-Z numbers.
Edit: With performance=enabled + OC=disabled, CPU-Z shows 3.6GHz max, with idle at 3.2-3.6.
Edit 2: This is with windows power options set to max CPU performance.Last edited: Feb 12, 2016 -
Reflash your BIOS, and make sure your machine is in high performance power setting.
-
I don't believe anything is wrong, so I'm not going to re-flash my BIOS until I see someone else post a screenshot showing something higher than 2.7GHz on their Windows system information screen (Win+Fn+Pause).
-
My i7-4910MQ shows 2.9 GHz in that screen, and hwinfo64 tells me it's running at 3.8 GHz. The Windows system information screen shows the stock (non-turbo) speed for your CPU.
HunterZ0 likes this. -
mine shows the same...... 2.7ghz
HunterZ0 said: ↑I don't believe anything is wrong, so I'm not going to re-flash my BIOS until I see someone else post a screenshot showing something higher than 2.7GHz on their Windows system information screen (Win+Fn+Pause).Click to expand...
and as for the 'CPU performance mode' in the BIOS, it appears to increase the wattage the chip can consume, i was unable to break TDP with it disabled. -
I wasn't really sure. I remember fires trike shows your turbo clock
-
HI folks...
I placed an order for an alienware 17 r3 after much deliberation, and even after the purchase (as i wait for it to be built and delivered...) I still deliberate. My biggest point of contention is that all I read is how gaming laptops are 'dumb' and aren't logical in the face of building a big desktop PC setup. However, I know there have to be more people like me that don't necessarily want some huge desk setup dominating a corner of their home... something about being able to just take it with me to the couch, or to a table, or wherever is very appealing, and is worth the apparent 'downsides'. Still, I'm a very internalizing person - and others' opinions have a way of making me jaded.
I also was considering waiting for Pascal... but I guess there will always be a new technology coming out? I am tired of waiting to get a rig... Maxwell isn't that bad right?
Anyways, how is this deal?
Alienware 17 r3
i7 6820hk
16gb ddr4
gtx 980m 8gb
1TB pcie-SSD + 1tb 7200 RPM
1080P screen (i didn't want the 4k screen, and the scaling issues that come with it, though it was an option)
3 Years premium support
3 years accidental insurance
Price - $2300.78 USD
I had a number of bad customer experiences, so they gave me some massive discounts... i think?Last edited: Feb 14, 2016 -
Reyess Foxtrot said: ↑HI folks...
I placed an order for an alienware 17 r3 after much deliberation, and even after the purchase (as i wait for it to be built and delivered...) I still deliberate. My biggest point of contention is that all I read is how gaming laptops are 'dumb' and aren't logical in the face of building a big desktop PC setup. However, I know there have to be more people like me that don't necessarily want some huge desk setup dominating a corner of their home... something about being able to just take it with me to the couch, or to a table, or wherever is very appealing, and is worth the apparent 'downsides'. Still, I'm a very internalizing person - and others' opinions have a way of making me jaded.
I also was considering waiting for Pascal... but I guess there will always be a new technology coming out? I am tired of waiting to get a rig... Maxwell isn't that bad right?
Anyways, how is this deal?
Alienware 17 r3
i7 6820hk
16gb ddr4
gtx 980m 8gb
1TB pcie-SSD + 1tb 7200 RPM
1080P screen (i didn't want the 4k screen, and the scaling issues that come with it, though it was an option)
3 Years premium support
3 years accidental insurance
Price - $2300.78 USD
I had a number of bad customer experiences, so they gave me some massive discounts... i think?Click to expand...
To put that into perspective, your $2300.78 USD = £1586.09 GBP
If I spec the same machine (including warranty etc..) it comes to £2,560.99 = $3714.97 USD (current exchange rates of 1USD - 0.69GBP)
Like you say, you could always be waiting for the next tech but to say "Maxwell isn't that bad right?" !!!! Apart from the desktop GTX 980 that has been shoved into some laptops, the GTX 980M is currently at the top of the mobile food chain. It lays waste to anything AMD has by quite some margin and is literally cooler doing so..
Make of that what you will. -
I built a cutting-edge gaming desktop in 2009. It's been great, but I ended up using my older XPS M1730 laptop more because it's hard to find time to hide in the office with kids and such. Thus, when my M1730 died I knew it would be worth it to buy a new gaming laptop.
I don't plan to upgrade my desktop either, except to add an SSD (from the dead M1730).
If you need portability or the ability to do computing stuff on the couch, a laptop makes sense. You can always connect an external monitor+keyboard+mouse to turn it into a desktop too. It's a trade-off: you get portability and versatility in exchange for higher cost and less upgrade-ability. -
finally updating the intel driver finally fixed the intel display error... Now its the wifi adapter that needs fixing. It randomly disables while your using it, there wont be any connection when you press the wifi logo. anyone experiencing this?
-
Snakedoc21 said: ↑finally updating the intel driver finally fixed the intel display error... Now its the wifi adapter that needs fixing. It randomly disables while your using it, there wont be any connection when you press the wifi logo. anyone experiencing this?Click to expand...
If on AC, try updating to latest drivers from Killer's site. If that doesn't help, try switching to driver-only install without Killer utilities. -
Reyess Foxtrot said: ↑HI folks...
I placed an order for an alienware 17 r3 after much deliberation, and even after the purchase (as i wait for it to be built and delivered...) I still deliberate. My biggest point of contention is that all I read is how gaming laptops are 'dumb' and aren't logical in the face of building a big desktop PC setup. However, I know there have to be more people like me that don't necessarily want some huge desk setup dominating a corner of their home... something about being able to just take it with me to the couch, or to a table, or wherever is very appealing, and is worth the apparent 'downsides'. Still, I'm a very internalizing person - and others' opinions have a way of making me jaded.
I also was considering waiting for Pascal... but I guess there will always be a new technology coming out? I am tired of waiting to get a rig... Maxwell isn't that bad right?
Anyways, how is this deal?
Alienware 17 r3
i7 6820hk
16gb ddr4
gtx 980m 8gb
1TB pcie-SSD + 1tb 7200 RPM
1080P screen (i didn't want the 4k screen, and the scaling issues that come with it, though it was an option)
3 Years premium support
3 years accidental insurance
Price - $2300.78 USD
I had a number of bad customer experiences, so they gave me some massive discounts... i think?Click to expand...
Who was your sales rep?
I was literally in a 2.5 hour online chat with my sales rep going over every option before I made the decision to pull the trigger. -
I got 6820hk it goes to 4.2but rare because its not neded.
sluggz said: ↑correct me if I'm wrong , but doesn't the 6820hk turbo to 3.6 without over locking? Your cpu shows 2.7 which is the stock non turbo clockClick to expand... -
Gamespy said: ↑I got 6820hk it goes to 4.2but rare because its not neded.Click to expand...
*OFFICIAL* Alienware 17 R2/R3 Owner's Lounge
Discussion in '2015+ Alienware 13 / 15 / 17' started by Mr. Fox, Dec 10, 2014.