The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Laptop power consumption with BT/RF mouse

    Discussion in 'Accessories' started by GilM, Jan 5, 2008.

  1. GilM

    GilM Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Hello,

    I'm wondering which type of mouse is preferable from laptop's power consumption perspective - RF with USB receiver or BT? I currently have laptop's bluetoooh adapter switched of, because I do not use any BT device. Is anybody know whether using built in bluetooth for BT mouse requires more power than USB RF receiver. Naively, I would think that BT uses more power since it's also transmits and not just receives (for pairing), but I would be happy if somebody could give more based answer.

    In general I prefer a BT mouse, in order to keep (only two) usb ports free, but battery life time is important for me.

    Thanks in advance,
    Gil
     
  2. John Ratsey

    John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,197
    Messages:
    28,841
    Likes Received:
    2,169
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Bluetooth could well use more power because it is designed to have a 10m or more range. Last year I found on the Samsung Q35 that having Bluetooth running also kept the CPU more active and significant hit the battery time. However, that may not affect other notebooks. It is easy to check by running the Performance Monitor (start > run > perfmon) and then looking at the time in the C3 power state.

    John
     
  3. bubba_000

    bubba_000 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    32
    Messages:
    319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I'm not an expert, but i don't think that there will be a significant difference betweeen the 2.
     
  4. caveman

    caveman Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I was kind of in the same boat, picking between bluetooth and just a USB RF mouse. Bluetooth would be the nicest because no extra dongles or anything, but in order for me to use bluetooth I have to keep my WLAN and bluetooth on, and when running off battery, it can take some time off my battery life.

    So in the end I chose a Microsoft Wireless Optical Mouse because it was a door crasher ($17.99) and it would probably be a bit easier on the battery.
     
  5. klutchrider

    klutchrider Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    21
    Messages:
    538
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    My main thoughts exactly were the consumption between BT and RF, at the end I opted to get a VX Nano because of the USB dongle that you never have to remove. Even though it is a pretty pricey mouse it is a good one for basic needs and gaming to the extent that you know it's a wireless mouse. :p
     
  6. ViciousXUSMC

    ViciousXUSMC Master Viking NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    11,461
    Messages:
    16,824
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    466
    I doubt it makes much of a difference, I have the tool to measure power consumption via AC so I can test if I get a BT mouse. I have the G7 witch uses the USB, and I have some BT devices like my headphones but not a mouse (however for the sake of things headphones will most definitely use more power if anything vs a mouse due to the higher bandwidth so I can still test if anybody is interested)
     
  7. axel23

    axel23 Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    well, it's not only the laptop's current consumption we shoud be concerned about! it's the BT mouse which drains the batteries much faster than a RF one.

    BT uses a time-division duplex (TDD) multiple-access scheme with 625-µs time slots, designed to communicate simultanously with multiple devices.

    A RF USB dongle uses a point to point communication which consumes significantly less power on both sides!!

    i'm about to buy a cordless now and my choice will most probably be: RF - because I'm not using any BT device right now and won't like the idea to turn BT on my ASPIRE 5920G on, I allready had problems with the BT drivers!! :mad: