The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    any decent laptop docks?

    Discussion in 'Accessories' started by captainmidnight, Apr 26, 2007.

  1. captainmidnight

    captainmidnight Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I would like a laptop dock with these characteristics:

    1) connects to laptop via a truly highspeed interface (e.g. ExpressCard; I have a dv6000t)

    2) has at least one DVI output port

    3) has an adequate graphics card; in particular, I want it to drive a widescreen monitor (e.g. my Gateway FPD2185W 21" flat panel monitor, with 1680x1050 resolution)

    4) would allow me to put a large capacity, high performance, SATA hard drive inside it (e.g. an existing 400 GB WD4000KD drive currently located inside my desktop), or have a eSATA port so I could connect a high speed drive that way


    I am aware of NO model on the market that comes close to having all of the above features, but am praying that someone points out one that I missed!

    I am aware of the recent models from Belkin and Targus, which at least have DVI. Alas, both have crap video cards which don't support widescreen monitors, let alone SATA hard drives...
     
  2. NeedALaptop07

    NeedALaptop07 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    9
    Messages:
    242
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Laptop docks have graphics cards in them? :confused: I've never heard of that.
     
  3. captainmidnight

    captainmidnight Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    >Laptop docks have graphics cards in them? I've never heard of that.

    I thought so!

    What else would be responsible for causing the Belkin and Targus docks to state that they only support maximum DVI resolutions of 1600x1200?

    If those docks simply passively pass on whatever video your latop internally can put out, then they should have no such spec, right?

    I do know for sure that my HP dv6000t can certainly drive my Gateway FPD2185W at its full 1680x1050 resolution when I directly hook up the monitor via my laptop's vga port.

    I'll be curious to know what other people with better knowledge report...
     
  4. CalebSchmerge

    CalebSchmerge Woof NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    1,126
    Messages:
    2,395
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I am pretty sure that the Belkin and Tagus docks don't actually have a graphics card in them. I think they are passive, but the restriction on resolution has to do with the bandwidth needed to run every device without compromise. They are supposed to be able to run audio, USB, and tons of other devices, and video, so the easiest way to guarantee that this will work is to limit the video. Current ExpressCards run at 1x, which is no doubt fast, but until we see something like 8x we won't get graphics limited video.
     
  5. Greg

    Greg Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    7,857
    Messages:
    16,212
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    466
    The Belkin dock (and I think the Targus one too) do have a graphics card, but only in the most mild of senses. Laptop sends compressed video data, and the "graphics card" decompresses and displays. At least that is how it appears to work. If there is no compression, the "graphics card" still would have to decode the data...and regardless that chip will have a hardware limitation on how high of a resolution it can support because it can only decode/decompress transmitted info so fast. It has to decode simply because the signal is not being sent over the traditional VGA/DVI connection.

    I could be wrong on some of this, but the 1600x1200 limitation is definitely a limitation imposed by the hardware capabilities some how. It isn't a software thing at all.

    I think the 1600x1200 resolution really only describes the maximum number of pixels the display can drive. It might work with 1680x1050 (which is less pixels), but I'm not 100% certain.
     
  6. Syndrome

    Syndrome Torque Matters

    Reputations:
    1,765
    Messages:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    546
    Trophy Points:
    131
    I can't really help you with the laptop you have now, but I think you can put graphics cards in to the docking bays that Dell uses for its Latitude line up. Graphics cards or Hard drives, not sure if they do both at the same time.
     
  7. Greg

    Greg Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    7,857
    Messages:
    16,212
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    466
    The graphics cards are only for allowing another monitor to be driven. While that is perfectly fine, do not expect to gain performance with respect to 3d applications like games and rendering. The bandwidth is not there.
     
  8. D3X

    D3X the robo know it all

    Reputations:
    688
    Messages:
    1,666
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Wow. Sounds like you want the new XG Station by Asus that was recently revealed at the CES 2007. Whic is the first dedicated external graphics for notebooks. Doesn't have highspeed harddrive support like SATA, but that can easily be solved with external drives like firewire or usb 2.0 since hard drives don't take that kind of bandwidth.
     
  9. captainmidnight

    captainmidnight Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Thanks much for all of your responces, guys.

    I especially appreciate the education on dock graphics.

    So, it looks like nobody makes quite what I want.

    Altho that Asus XG Station is a huge step in the right direction: if it supported an internal 3.5" SATA drive at full bandwidth, I would pay up for it. Having to buy an additional external USB hard drive enclosure is the final annoyance at holding me back from buying it.

    Speaking of hard drive enclosures, my understanding is that USB 2.0 does NOT really deliver its alleged bandwidth. 480 Mb/s = 80 MB/s seems like it should be sufficient to handle any single drive, but I read several reports yesterday from people reporting real world usb drive performance to be 3+ times lower than that. Intel must have screwed up USB's design somehow, since firewire and eSATA external drives deliver their full performance.

    I am going to probably buy a USB/eSATA hard drive enclosure, even tho my current laptop has no eSATA connector, simply for future compatibility.

    Some models that I am considering are:

    VANTEC NST-360SU-BK 3.5" eSATA + USB2.0 Aluminum External Enclosure - Retail
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817145167

    Thermaltake A2395 Aluminum 3.5" ESATA + USB2.0 External Enclosure
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817145026

    AZiO ENC311SU41 Aluminum 3.5" eSATA + USB 2.0 External Enclosure
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817106097

    If any of you have any further insight into any of those models, or an even better one, please lemme know ASAP since I want to order from Newegg today.