The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Crucial M4 raid0 seems slow

    Discussion in 'Alienware 17 and M17x' started by thehuntress, May 7, 2012.

  1. thehuntress

    thehuntress Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    39
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I got raid0 128gb Crucial M4 x2 just a few days ago and I am a little disappointed+confused with the performance. I'm using the latest SSD firmware, drivers on motherboard, and Intel Rapid Storage. The laptop is plugged. My much slower 6 year-old desktop boots 5 seconds faster and loads games just as fast. Both have the same amount of files.

    AMD Athlon 64 x2 6000 3ghz dual core with Samsung OEM SATA II 128gb SSD

    vs

    Intel Core i7-2670m with Crucial M4 raid0 SATA III 128gb SSD x2

    :confused: :confused: :confused:
     
  2. aarpcard

    aarpcard Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    606
    Messages:
    1,129
    Likes Received:
    284
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Use HDtune to get some benchmarks for the read and write speed (random and sequential) for both setups.

    If the SSD configuration is showing normal performance values, then we can rule out bad drives.
     
  3. thehuntress

    thehuntress Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    39
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Will do. Thanks!

    I will post the results right after.

    SATA II - it's actually Toshiba, not Samsung

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Raid0 Crucial M4

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Crucial M4 definitely looks faster on the benchmarks, but it doesnt explain how my desktop is faster. My desktop loads Windows startup before the logo even finishes forming whereas my laptop takes 5 seconds longer (from the moment Windows loading screen shows up, not starting from BIOS). Starcraft 2 opens at the same time.

    I also have a i5-2500k 4ghz overclock with Crucial C300 64gb on a z68 mobo at school. It boots about as fast as my older desktop here at home and loads games just slightly faster. So then based on my experience, is it safe to say that SATA II vs SATA III vs SATA III raid0 performance gains are negligible?
     
  4. Tsunade_Hime

    Tsunade_Hime such bacon. wow

    Reputations:
    5,413
    Messages:
    10,711
    Likes Received:
    1,204
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Have you tried recreating the array and reinstalling Windows? My RAID 0 320 series array is usable in like 10 seconds..
     
  5. thehuntress

    thehuntress Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    39
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I'm using a fresh install of Windows and I'm pretty lucky to get the 6990m updated to latest driver, so I'm not sure I'm willing to reinstall Windows right now :p

    I just used a stop watch to test boot times (from 'Starting Windows' to Windows Desktop post-mouse icon loading)

    Old desktop - 14.6 secs
    Alienware m17x R3 - 19 secs

    Well 5 seconds wont hurt my life :p But I did not pay $200 to get beat by a really old SATA II ssd :mad:
     
  6. Tsunade_Hime

    Tsunade_Hime such bacon. wow

    Reputations:
    5,413
    Messages:
    10,711
    Likes Received:
    1,204
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Well are you sure your SSDs are good? Try installing Windows on each invididual one and see if one has issues. I tested out both of my 160 GB SSDs and RAID 0 went perfectly fine.

    Your HDDTune scores are okay, here is my 320 series 160GB RAID 0 scores

    [​IMG]
     
  7. thehuntress

    thehuntress Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    39
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I found the problem!!
    Read this thread. I downgraded my BIOS from A10 to A08 and look at my benchmarks now

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  8. SlickDude80

    SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    3,262
    Messages:
    4,997
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Huntress, run a crystaldisk mark...A09 and up will downclock to SATA2 so it is definitely good you went back to A08
     
  9. thehuntress

    thehuntress Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    39
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    [​IMG]
     
  10. Tsunade_Hime

    Tsunade_Hime such bacon. wow

    Reputations:
    5,413
    Messages:
    10,711
    Likes Received:
    1,204
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Those writes are abysmal, try the registry tweaks in DR650SE's signature.
     
  11. thehuntress

    thehuntress Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    39
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    The write speeds seem right, at least on seq and 4kqd32. Crucial rated it as "up to 175mb/s write," but I will check those registry when I get home.
     
  12. SlickDude80

    SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    3,262
    Messages:
    4,997
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    106
    huntress, you can compare your numbers to this...this is 128gig M4 Raid 0

    [​IMG]
     
  13. thehuntress

    thehuntress Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    39
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Awesome! Thanks! I will run the benchmark again later using the same "3 , 1000mb" settings. I used 5 and 50mb, maybe that skewed my benchmark a little bit.

    Here are the results.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Something doesnt look right. I've also followed all the instructions on the SSD tweaking guide. Maybe I've been running the benchmarks too much. I also started using the Windows Boot Time software. I get 19.8 secs here and 13.5 secs on the SATA II desktop.