'lo,
Did some searching but did not have any luck finding threads on putting a GTX 765 in an R2. Anyone know if it has been done?
This R2 shipped back on 11.22.10 and the GTX 285 SLi are getting tired. Looking on eBay I see 765s are fetching a bit over $300 which seems like an excellent upgrade. Dropped a 920XM in a awhile back and now debating if dropping the coin for a new GPU(if possible) would be the hassle or just put it towards a new rig.
Thanks!
-
an even more excellent option in the r2 is to use 7970m's or 8970m's. See sig. Otherwise as far as I know, the last SLI that works on the R2 is the 580m.
reborn2003 likes this. -
reborn2003 likes this.
-
Alienware-L_Porras Company Representative
reborn2003 likes this. -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
-
No desire to go down the SLi road again just want to bring the graphics back from the dead. Checking eBay I see a 7970s up in the $450-500 range and not sure the performance increase over a 765 is worth 50% more. Unless the 7970 is that much stronger than a 765 I would rather put the savings from going with a 765 towards an SSD. Will have to ponder the choices a bit more. -
780m vs 765m
Significantly better passmark score 4,221 vs 2,036 More than 2x better passmark score
Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score 27,258 vs 13,397 More than 2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly more memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Much better floating-point performance 2,369 GFLOPS vs 1,224 GFLOPS Around 95% better floating-point performance
Much higher texture rate 98.7 GTexel/s vs 51 GTexel/s Around 95% higher texture rate
Significantly higher pixel rate 24.7 GPixel/s vs 12.8 GPixel/s Around 95% higher pixel rate
Better 3DMark06 score 23,381.5 vs 19,624 Around 20% better 3DMark06 score
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 7,776.5 vs 4,021 Around 95% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,000 MHz vs 4,008 MHz Around 25% higher effective memory clock speed
Many more texture mapping units 128 vs 64 Twice as many texture mapping units
Many more shading units 1,536 vs 768 Twice as many shading units
Significantly more render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 29.25 fps vs 14.2 fps More than 2x higher crysis 3 framerate
Much higher dead space 3 framerate 143.9 fps vs 70.1 fps More than 2x higher dead space 3 framerate
Significantly higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate 119.35 fps vs 63.6 fps Around 90% higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate
Significantly wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate 46.6 fps vs 23.18 fps More than 2x higher BioShock infinite framerate
Significantly better CLBenchmark raytrace score 126,734 vs 55,794 More than 2.2x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Significantly higher diablo III framerate 186.1 fps vs 111.7 fps More than 65% higher diablo III framerate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,250 MHz vs 1,002 MHz Around 25% higher memory clock speed
Significantly better passmark direct compute score 2,195 vs 1,270 Around 75% better passmark direct compute score -
Actually, a single 765m is barely an upgrade at all, compared to 285M's in SLI. So little, that different driver configs alone would put either one out ahead in performance. Now a 780m, thats a completely different story. You'd be around 2x the benchmarks and performance, and using less power and less heat.
-
Just post in the Want to Buy section and wait to see if someone will sell you a card. The 765M really isnt much of an upgrade at all... especially with next-gen here games will start to become a lot more demanding. It is best to get the performance needed now so you dont have to worry about upgrading anytime soon down the line.reborn2003 likes this.
GTX 765 in an R2?
Discussion in 'Alienware 17 and M17x' started by resu, Dec 12, 2013.