Using hdtune and crystaldisk as benchmkarks on my system i get half the speed if my disks are in raid 1. I made them non-raid disks and they doubled in speed. This is using alienwares raid drivers and all. Is this why raid 1 array is not offered in thei configurator page? I thought raid 1 would run as fast as single drive.....
-
Read performance should be roughly 2 * 500MB/s (excluding sata 3/6 issues), while Write Performance should in theory be 1 * 500MB/s - Overhead of mirroring to second drive.
So I would expect around lets say 460-480ish on writes worse case, and 900+ on reads.
Also: Check the speeds in Atto Download ATTO Disk Benchmark v2.34 | techPowerUp
I have noticed discrepancies in hdtune/crystal. -
In RAID 1 your system writes the same info to each disk. So it writes it twice, which explains the decrease in performance by 50%. Though it is like creating a real time backup so if one disk fails, you have an exact duplicate.
-
-
-
-
Raid 1 performance: (Identical Disks 500mb/s)
Writes: 1 * 500mb/s - overhead.
Reads: N * 500mb/s (where N = number of disks).
If you're not seeing something similar to this definitely monitor the sata 3/6 of the devices. -
-
-
intel raid storage says both drives are at 3.0BG/s speeds so that should be sata 2. -
Do you have a crystal disk before and after or the numbers at least?
Edit: Another thought, one of the sata ports might have a hardware issue. Have you tested both drives individually outside of a raid volume (however you want to call it). Just wondering if the two ports have identical performance. Port 1 was dead/had issues on mine. -
-
Is this on each drive? or did you only bench one? ie see my previous edit. -
-
-
Mmm, yeah, Software vs. Hardware RAID doesn't take a big performance hit unless you are doing RAID-5, where XOR parity calculations are done on every bit of data written to the drive. Other RAID levels should be very close in performance.
I speak from experience, having done comparisons of a 4x SSD RAID on my desktop machine some years back, and comparing ICH9 vs. an Areca RAID controller with a hardware parity engine. In some rare cases the ICH9 software RAID actually managed to outpace the hardware RAID, most likely due to software RAID having access to the full complement of system RAM for use as a cache, while the hardware RAID has a dedicated DIMM for cache operations, limiting it's size. -
Here's what I would do
(1) Test both disk(s) in crystal disk to rule out drive differences (internally if the same skip (2))
(2) If you have access to a usb 3.0 enclosure test both drives in that (if both are the same it will be a sata port/mb issue).
(3) Check raid drivers, you said you have intel RST, you using an older, newest, somewhere in between version of the raid driver?
(4) Bios update, if running on an older bios (not sure if you're running A03 etc).
half the performance in raid 1 array....
Discussion in 'Alienware 18 and M18x' started by ARGH, Aug 30, 2011.