The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    actual PERFORMANCE difference with updated drivers?

    Discussion in 'Alienware M11x' started by deadboy90, Nov 29, 2011.

  1. deadboy90

    deadboy90 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    44
    Messages:
    625
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Just like the title says, has anyone seen any actual real world preformance difference with the updated drivers on the r1? Or should I stick with the old 197.xxx drivers?
     
  2. darkdomino

    darkdomino Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    203
    Messages:
    833
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Definitely update to the nvidia drivers. The Dell drivers are complete garbage.

    If you upgrade and don't like them, you can always roll back. I say go for it. You will get FPS improvements in your games.
     
  3. DrGoodvibes

    DrGoodvibes Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    389
    Messages:
    973
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    If you're asking that question, then there's probably no reason to upgrade/change.

    You won't get any 'real' FPS benefits from Nvidia. It has been mooted you may even loose performance when upgrading to newer drivers.

    The only reasons I can think of to upgrade is specific 'fixes' for games/applications you use AND the lesser known reason that default Intel GMA GPU acceleration does not work on the original M11xR1 driver-set. You need Intel GMA 2202 or above (as I remember) for Firefox and at least Intel GMA 2020 for IE9 to work natively.

    If you look at the highest (look mum no soldered CPU mods) 3DMark06 rankings, they were almost all done on the original M11xR1 driver-set.

    Think I stopped at 260.63/2020 and forced Mozilla GPU acceleration.

    With Intel GMA enabled we see the following:

    Using the Microsoft fish-tank on Firefox 9.0 _WITHOUT_ GPU acceleration and 100 fish in full screen (F11) you get around 10 FPS.

    Using the Microsoft fish-tank on Firefox 9.0 _WITH_ GPU acceleration _FORCED_ and 100 fish in full screen (F11) you get around 40 FPS.

    The technicalities of what the IE fish tank is really testing aside, a 4 times increase is not a bad thing.

    I'm guessing IE9/IE10 would be much the same with GPU acceleration enabled under Intel GMA.

    One test, is if your IE9 browser is locked to software GPU rendering, your Intel GMA version is not high enough.

    On the Nvidia front, GPU acceleration is fine if you're over 258.96
     
  4. GNandGS

    GNandGS Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    69
    Messages:
    1,247
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    56
    263 official release seemed same as 197 to me but there was no downside either. Give em a whirl.
     
  5. ejohnson

    ejohnson Is that lemon zest?

    Reputations:
    827
    Messages:
    2,278
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Im still rockin the 197 drivers. Work great for me.
     
  6. DrGoodvibes

    DrGoodvibes Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    389
    Messages:
    973
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I use Intel integrated GPU quite a bit, like for coding and web browsing.

    Using the 197 hybrid Nvidia driver set would imply you are using the Intel GMA 1994.

    How's that going using the Intel GPU?

    Or are you a Game on, Game off sort of person?

    In Intel GMA 2413 they fixed the following issue:
    3886450 - BSOD seen after installing Switchable Graphics driver and then restarting the system.

    With Intel GMA 1994 you would have no IE9/IE10 GPU acceleration.
    You'd have to force GPU acceleration for Mozilla (Hows that go out of interest on Intel GMA 1994?)

    So with Intel GMA 1994 what do you get for the following?

    Intel GMA 8.15.10.2020 integrated GPU:

    IE9.0 - Internet Options -> Advanced [Accelerated graphics]

    [ ] Use software rendering instead of GPU rendering*

    This option should NOT be ticked.

    Firefox 9.0 - about:support

    Adapter Description Mobile Intel(R) 4 Series Express Chipset Family
    Vendor ID 8086
    Device ID 2a42
    Adapter RAM Unknown
    Adapter Drivers igdumd64 igd10umd64 igdumdx32 igd10umd32
    Driver Version 8.15.10.2020
    Driver Date 12-11-2009
    Vendor ID (GPU #2) 10de
    Device ID (GPU #2) 0caf
    Adapter RAM (GPU #2) 1024
    Adapter Drivers (GPU #2) nvd3dumx,nvwgf2umx,nvwgf2umx nvd3dum,nvwgf2um,nvwgf2um
    Driver Version (GPU #2) 8.17.12.6063
    Driver Date (GPU #2) 9-10-2010
    Direct2D Enabled true
    DirectWrite Enabled true (6.1.7601.17563)
    ClearType Parameters DISPLAY1 [ Gamma: 2200 Pixel Structure: RGB ClearType Level: 50 Enhanced Contrast: 300 ] DISPLAY3 [ Gamma: 2200 Pixel Structure: RGB ClearType Level: 50 Enhanced Contrast: 200 ] DISPLAY5 [ Gamma: 2200 Pixel Structure: RGB ClearType Level: 100 Enhanced Contrast: 200 ]
    WebGL Renderer Google Inc. -- ANGLE (Mobile Intel(R) 4 Series Express Chipset Family) -- OpenGL ES 2.0 (ANGLE 0.0.0.740)
    GPU Accelerated Windows 1/1 Direct3D 10


    Chrome 17.0 - about:gpu

    Canvas: Hardware accelerated
    3D CSS: Hardware accelerated
    HTML Rendering: Hardware accelerated
    WebGL: Hardware accelerated
    WebGL multisampling: Hardware accelerated

    Opera 12.0 - opera:gpu

    Vega backend: Software
    OpenGL Backend not supported: Unsupported backend version

    If Opera GPU acceleration was supported we'd see the following:

    Vega backend: OpenGL
    OpenGL Blocklist version: 1.0.4
    OpenGL Blocklist status for 2D: Supported
    OpenGL Blocklist status for 3D: Supported

    Opera GPU acceleration is supported on Nvidia 260.63​
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2015
  7. ejohnson

    ejohnson Is that lemon zest?

    Reputations:
    827
    Messages:
    2,278
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Old intel works pretty good for me, heats up pretty good while running media monkey for some reason though...

    USing chrome, I havent had any of those old non working youtube videos like we had long ago.
     
  8. DrGoodvibes

    DrGoodvibes Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    389
    Messages:
    973
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    So using the Chrome browser you have GPU acceleration using Intel GMA (Graphics Media Accelerator) version 7.14.10.1944?

    Just trying to get my ducks in a row, before I start herding cats. :D

    You can test this in the Chrome browser with the following 'URL' input:

    about:gpu.

    You can check the GMA version in Device Manager->Display adapters->Driver Details and then check the version of igdkmd64.sys

    I know IE9.0 GPU acceleration doesn't work with GMA version 7.14.10.1944.
     
  9. ejohnson

    ejohnson Is that lemon zest?

    Reputations:
    827
    Messages:
    2,278
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    81
    This is the driver link that I am using.
    http://www.dell.com/support/drivers/us/en/04/DriverDetails/DriverFileFormats?DriverId=R273113




    Graphics Feature Status
    Canvas: Software rendered. Hardware acceleration not enabled.
    3D CSS: Hardware accelerated
    HTML Rendering: Hardware accelerated
    WebGL: Hardware accelerated
    WebGL multisampling: Hardware accelerated
    Problems Detected
    Accelerated 2D canvas has been disabled at the command line
    Version Information
    Data exported Fri Dec 02 2011 06:12:43 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)
    Chrome version 15.0.874.121 (Official Build 109964) m
    Software rendering list version 1.22
    Driver Information
    Initialization time 584
    Vendor Id 0x8086
    Device Id 0x2a42
    Driver vendor
    Driver version 8.17.11.9772
    Driver date 4-28-2010
    Pixel shader version 3.0
    Vertex shader version 3.0
    GL version
    GL_VENDOR
    GL_RENDERER
    GL_VERSION
    GL_EXTENSIONS
    Diagnostics
    0
    b3DAccelerationEnabled true
    b3DAccelerationExists true
    bAGPEnabled true
    bAGPExistenceValid true
    bAGPExists true
    bCanRenderWindow true
    bDDAccelerationEnabled true
    bDriverBeta false
    bDriverDebug false
    bDriverSigned false
    bDriverSignedValid false
    bNoHardware false
    dwBpp 32
    dwDDIVersion 10
    dwHeight 768
    dwRefreshRate 60
    dwWHQLLevel 0
    dwWidth 1366
    iAdapter 0
    lDriverSize 0
    lMiniVddSize 0
    szAGPStatusEnglish Enabled
    szAGPStatusLocalized Enabled
    szChipType
    szD3DStatusEnglish Enabled
    szD3DStatusLocalized Enabled
    szDACType
    szDDIVersionEnglish 10
    szDDIVersionLocalized 10
    szDDStatusEnglish Enabled
    szDDStatusLocalized Enabled
    szDXVAHDEnglish Supported
    szDXVAModes ModeMPEG2_A ModeMPEG2_C ModeWMV9_B ModeWMV9_C ModeVC1_B ModeVC1_C
    szDescription Mobile Intel(R) 4 Series Express Chipset Family
    szDeviceId 0x2A42
    szDeviceIdentifier {D7B78E66-6902-11CF-5274-4924A7C2C535}
    szDeviceName \\.\DISPLAY1
    szDisplayMemoryEnglish 1695 MB
    szDisplayMemoryLocalized 1695 MB
    szDisplayModeEnglish 1366 x 768 (32 bit) (60Hz)
    szDisplayModeLocalized 1366 x 768 (32 bit) (60Hz)
    szDriverAssemblyVersion
    szDriverAttributes
    szDriverDateEnglish
    szDriverDateLocalized
    szDriverLanguageEnglish
    szDriverLanguageLocalized
    szDriverModelEnglish WDDM 1.1
    szDriverModelLocalized WDDM 1.1
    szDriverName
    szDriverNodeStrongName oem15.inf:NVIDIA_SetA_Devices.NTamd64.6.1:iCNT0:8.17.11.9772 :pci\ven_8086&dev_2a42&subsys_04431028
    szDriverSignDate
    szDriverVersion
    szKeyDeviceID Enum\PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2A42&SUBSYS_04431028&REV_07
    szKeyDeviceKey \Registry\Machine\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Video\{C41725D9-2210-47DE-99CE-EFF94260F487}\0000
    szManufacturer
    szMiniVdd
    szMiniVddDateEnglish
    szMiniVddDateLocalized
    szMonitorMaxRes
    szMonitorName Generic PnP Monitor
    szNotesEnglish No problems found.

    szNotesLocalized No problems found.

    szOverlayEnglish Supported
    szRankOfInstalledDriver 00E60001
    szRegHelpText
    szRevision
    szRevisionId 0x0007
    szSubSysId 0x04431028
    szTestResultD3D7English Not run
    szTestResultD3D7Localized Not run
    szTestResultD3D8English Not run
    szTestResultD3D8Localized Not run
    szTestResultD3D9English Not run
    szTestResultD3D9Localized Not run
    szTestResultDDEnglish Not run
    szTestResultDDLocalized Not run
    szVdd
    szVendorId 0x8086
    Log Messages
    [2552:3092:209275:INFO:gpu_child_thread.cc(108)] : gpu_info_collector::CollectGraphicsInfo complete
     
  10. DrGoodvibes

    DrGoodvibes Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    389
    Messages:
    973
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Oh dear, Sorry to read that :(

    Both(All) Dell M11xR1 drivers use Intel GMA version 7.14.10.1944, so, well, oppps.

    Pity peoples like me didn't man up and say, but I'm not a gamer and I use Intel GMA and maybe Dell would have put GMA version 2202 into the driver build.

    So, natively it appears Intel GMA version 7.14.10.1944 doesn't support GPU acceleration. bummer. Not even sure if you can force it in Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox using this version.

    I know using Google Chrome 17.0.932.0.Beta with Intel GMA 8.15.10.2020 GPU Hardware acceleration is supported.

    Also with Nvidia 197.72 you may not get Mozilla GPU acceleration and would most definately have to force it, if one can.

    I'd use Dell Nvidia 263.08 as then at least your Nvidia driver is in the ball park, even if your Intel GMA driver has gone to hell in a hand cart.
     
  11. ejohnson

    ejohnson Is that lemon zest?

    Reputations:
    827
    Messages:
    2,278
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    81
    For whatever reason, I cant get the 263 to ever work. When I install it, I loose my switching sometimes, and sometimes it says it switches, but I am stuck at 800x600 for my games. I tried on a fresh install of windows, old install of windows, and even the factory install of windows. Nothing ever worked. So I just left it at the 197. It runs just fine this way anyhow.

    I cant update to the newest nvidia, I use my intel more than the nvidia so I need my battery life.
     
  12. GNandGS

    GNandGS Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    69
    Messages:
    1,247
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    56
    263 was a pia for me to install but once I did run as admin it was fine
     
  13. ejohnson

    ejohnson Is that lemon zest?

    Reputations:
    827
    Messages:
    2,278
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    81
    See, I tried that, I tried just about every way possible. Spent about 3 days working on it, never could get it to work :(

    I try it again every now and then, it still fails though
     
  14. GNandGS

    GNandGS Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    69
    Messages:
    1,247
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Dang. I would stick to 197 then