with the release of the v180 series of drivers, i felt it was time to upgrade from v179.13 i had been using. so, i decided to go for Dox' customized 180.43. after installing them, i ran 3dmark, and achieved:
180.43 => 9825
nice score there. but when 180.48 (apparently, uber-performing gaming driver) was released, i updated again. to my shock, 3dmark now gave me:
180.48 => 9109
wth? down by over 800 points? wowza. so i figured the driver was just bad at 3dmark, since gaming performance was decent. but then i ran 3dmark again.
180.48 #2 => 8326
ok, not good. score down by a mere 1500 points!! at this point, i re-installed the old 180.43 driver. now, my 3dmark score was:
180.43 #2 => 8331
naturally, this worried me quite a bit. in desperation, i went all the way back to 179.13. interestingly, my GPU was labeled 8700m-gt by the driver. at any rate, 3dmark now gives me:
179.13 #2 => 9706
so all's well that ends well. still, i'd like to know: has anybody else been getting abnormally low 3dmark scores with the 180 series drivers?
-
Yes I am getting the same results with the lower 3d mark scores. I am doing a throe test of them right now.
-
phew, so it's not me. i'm looking forward to your comparisons, dwend.
-
Here are my results. It seems that the 179.13 has much better shader performance. The lightmark 08 test for the 179.13 is not a lie, Retested 3 times with ~4 fps difference. It was reaching up 500-600fps, in some places. The shadow test in lightmark did very well, the others were reaching 40-60FPS in the Penumbra test were as the 179.13 was around 90fps.
-
i got 10444 3dmark06 when i first got my unit. driver & windows (vista Home Premium x32) are from AW .
i don't actually know what driver was .
after upgrading to vista x64 ultimate no matter what driver i install i got no more than 9700. -
I just re-tested my system using 3DMark06.
With my T9300 and 8700M GT, I ended up with a 5217 score... which is great for my video card... the average for my card is around 4700ish.
Driver version: 179.14 -
The guy from Roswell Crew, Kevin, told me that for the m8800GTX, 9500 is the average score. If you manage to get more than that then you have a pretty nice setup already.
-
-
3dmark is too dependent on the CPU to be able to generalize like that.
-
Well, I have the 2.4Ghz Processor, so then it must mean that you should be getting more than that then.
-
-
yeah... m15x averages would be higher due to that fact. -
Phew, and here I thought I was getting a lower score than everybody else!
Glad to see I'm a little bit past the average. =) -
yeah
Oceanus, your score is perfectly normal. I get the same scores as you do.
3dmark & driver woes
Discussion in 'Alienware' started by whizzo, Nov 23, 2008.