The t's are older than the p's offered by HP? T8300 VS P8600?
-
sayhwat???
-
yeah, HP is using the montevina microarchitecture (CPU designations "P"), AW is still on Santa Rosa (CPU designations "T" for Penryns).
-
the AW motherboards don't support montevina... yet.
I think the next lineup of AW laptops will be the ones montevina capable -
Charles P. Jefferies Lead Moderator Super Moderator
The performance difference between the two is not going to be noticeable, even in synthetic benchmarks. Montevina's just another platform.
-
steveninspokane John 14:6 - Only ONE Way!
However, the Montevina's will offer a cooler processor by 10w.
-
yeah right, just like when Santa rosa came out over nappa, they said the same thing, when Penreyns cameout they said the same thing, the lesser heat will be notable on lower freequency, but on full load, i dont think so.
-
filling space... -
-
The "T" ande "P" in the Montevina line up designate the watts. "T" is 35 and "P" is 25.
And yes the x15 and x17 are not Montevina boards, they are Santa Rosa. Montevina is a new version of the Santa Rosa architecture. -
If you’re looking at either of those notebooks, then battery life is not a concern. On the other hand, the m15x already gets good battery life. -
filling space... -
P8600 will run cooler when at full load. The T8300 has good voltage tolerance, hence it undervolts well....
Plus DDR3-1066 > DDR2-667 (25% performance increase)
New notebooks w/new platform -> New BIOS -> New/Better GPUs -
Andy said: ↑P8600 will run cooler when at full load. The T8300 has good voltage tolerance, hence it undervolts well....
Plus DDR3-1066 > DDR2-667 (25% performance increase)
New notebooks w/new platform -> New BIOS -> New/Better GPUsClick to expand...
the process is still 45nm, the frequency isn't changing, the voltage isn't changing, the Cache isn't changing.... the only things that are changing is the FSB and the multiplier. they CLAIM a lower TDP for the chips, but I highly doubt there will be any significant difference in operating temps. manufacturers will just have cheaper, less effective cooling solutions. whopee. -
When you undervolt (say a T8300), you reduce the max power consumption (say by 10W), hence your Max Load temps drop down significantly ( probably by 15*C).
The P-series already have the max power consumption reduced (by 10W), so it has a lower Max Load temp than the standard T8300 CPU ( say by 15*C ^).
If you undervolt a P-series, you could further reduce the max power consumption, and hence reduce the load temps even more....
It basically helps users to run intensive tasks, at not so-high temps. -
Andy said: ↑When you undervolt (say a T8300), you reduce the max power consumption (say by 10W), hence your Max Load temps drop down significantly ( probably by 15*C).
The P-series already have the max power consumption reduced (by 10W), so it has a lower Max Load temp than the standard T-series CPUs ( say by 15*C ^).
If you undervolt a P-series, you could further reduce the max power consumption, and hence reduce the load temps even more....Click to expand...
greattttt. -
No, undervolting never increases/decreases performance in any way....
Check out the Undervolting Guide.
Undervolting will NOT compromise performance at all. Underclocking and Overclocking (clock speeds) is whats responsible in regards to performance. Benchmarks will also prove that performance remains the same. Most beginners usually think and assume undervolting will sacrifice performance but they are wrong.Click to expand...Not all processor chips are built equally. Each individual processor have different voltage tolerances. Instead of Intel tuning each chip's voltage individually for the lowest voltage possible and risking instability, they made a fully stable standard voltage for all chips to run on. The problem is this standard factory voltage they put is quite high. Undervolting takes advantage of this by reducing it to the right amount.Click to expand...
AW still using older cpu?
Discussion in 'Alienware' started by BMW135i, Sep 1, 2008.