somebody is reporting to Alienware![]()
-
-
-
If I was AW I wouldn't know what to make of these poll results. lol
They are quite skewed by the different options. I selected yes AND I prefer 16:9 so, yes, I can read directions! -
-
I would like my notebook to look like a notebook, hence 16:10 screen. I have seen my friend's 'widescreen' DELL last week which looked like an oversized chocolate bar in dimensions!
In my view, 16:9 is good for watching movies, reading PDF / word documents side-by-side. 16:10 will help reduce vertical scrolling till an extend, and it gives the feel of a real notebook, in my opinion. Infact, one of the major reasons I chose the expensive, high-end gaming segment for making my new laptop purchase!
Chaz, was careless to read the poll properly, voted only ONEforgive my sin!
-
-
-
It all comes down to personal preferences in the end. As most of the members have said, soon the entire laptop market might migrate to 16:9 aspect ratio. I am used to the 16:10 aspect ratio in my Acer Travelmate for the last 4 years and love it. I am also used to the 16:9 screen aspect ratio of my ex-roommate's HP and personally I prefer the 16:10 screen of my own laptop.
-
Either. Just give us a better quality LCD.
-
Also, lose the E2E display. That way I can put my own lcd in if I don't like it!
The E2E looks cool when the system is off. Otherwise it's just a nuisance...... -
I'd really prefer 16:10 but unless it was the deciding factor (two notebooks very similar in every way apart from screen) then it wouldn't put me off if a notebook was 16:9.
-
-
16:9 comes in 17.3".
However I'm not too sure the the existing M17x chassis would be able to fit it because of the extra width compared to a 16:10. If Dell wanted to swap a new 16:9 screen in the existing M17x frame there's a good chance it'd have to be 16.4" because it has roughly the same width as a 16:10 17". -
-
It's just a hypothetical. Don't misunderstand cause that's how rumors start.
-
-
I was genuinely surprised that the M17x didn't get a 16:9 17.3 at launch....and a bit disappointed because I wanted to hear people's cries of woe. :laugh: -
Meh..
How about a non-auto contrasting screen? That's something worth debating about -
If they went 16:9 the M17x would have had more options than Samsungs for their screens, so maybe you would have gotten one without auto-contrast or bleed. ;þ
-
just connecting the HYPOTHETICAL dots :] -
I doubt Samsung is the only mfr making 16:10 screens. lol
I think that was more of a money thing than anything else.... -
Let us choose a screen when ordering by manufacturer, panel type, and full detailed specs--that would be innovative...
-
-
and not cost effective at all for Dell
-
Meh... So what, drake!
We are wishing over here so cut us some slack! lol
-
If this poll were conducted 1/2 a yr ago, I would probably have said no. But, after dealing with an Asus W90, it wasn't so bad, so I would probably vote yes. I still prefer 16:10 but I could live with 16:9 as long as the vertical pixel count is no less than 900.
-
ok, how about if they have a deal already in place with 3 different manufactures for LCDs (like they did for the M1730) then you have a choice of one of the three.
Then they would probably have overstock of the Samsung panels and start giving discounts to people to take them off their hands. -
It'd be nice to have 3 or 4 options.
Heck, I'd settle for the options that the 1640 curently has... -
-
16:10 is widescreen.
As is the wider 16:9..... -
lol fail
-
-
-
AW's bottom line is their problem. They are making a hefty profit on these laptops. Making more LCD choices available would result in more sales. AW chose a lousy LCD for a well made notebook. They could have done much better. Why not have more LCD options?
-
-
If the new M17x was 16:9, would you still buy it?
Discussion in 'Alienware' started by Charles P. Jefferies, Aug 17, 2009.