1680x1050 and 1920x1200 are too high for a 15.4 screen imo. If you want that high of a res, id suggest a second display. 1440x900 is not too high and not too low, just right imo. As for discounts, no come back there, but Im a college student so idc![]()
-
At least they should have an option for the screen like the 17" MBP does.
Apart from the price, the screen resolution is another reason why I am not buying a MBP. -
If you ask for my opinion, I like 1440x900 on a 15.4-inch screen for normal tasks, but would prefer 1680x1050 for Photoshop work. But if I had to choose one or the other, I'd go 1440x900, as 1680x1050 on a 15.4-inch screen makes text too small, if you ask me.
And 1920x1200 is way too high on a 15.4-inch screen for me. -
Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2015
-
It definitely depends on what you do on the laptop as to what resolution is going to work best for you. Yes the text will be smaller on a 1680x1050 or 1920x1200 but if you have good eyesight that may not be of matter to you when planning to do a lot of Photoshop work or especially Excel type work where you have large spreadsheets to view.
-
the one thing I wish the mbp had was a higher-res display, something around 1680x1050. before I got my mbp I had a compal hel80 with a 1680x1050 display and the res was awesome, too bad the screen colors sucked
-
So no competitors yet?
I mean seriously now, guys. A REAL ONE. Not freaking Dell m1330. That's not even close.
Anyone? -
SaferSephiroth The calamity from within
What happened to the 15" XPS?
-
-
-
MBP competitors
Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by Sahin, Nov 1, 2007.