I'm wondering how my desktop would compare against a new Macbook that I'm thinking of getting.
My current computer is a 2.4GHz Core 2 Quad, 3GB RAM @ 667MHz, and a 8500 GT with 512 DDR2 RAM.
I'm thinking of getting the 2.4 GHz Macbook with 4GB of RAM. How will these two systems compare, and since most likely the desktop is more powerful, what % performance do you think the Macbook would compare against the desktop? I'm curious as to how the 8500GT would do against the 9400, as I know that the 8500GT is not a very good card, but it is dedicated after all, as opposed to the integrated 9400.
-
The only thing a new macbook would have over you is memory. the graphics might be a bit worse, maybe just as good.
-
The CPU won't make a noticeable difference in day-to-day computing but you'll feel it when say converting a video. I have a 2.4 GHz Q6600 as well on my desktop, and a 2.0 GHz MacBook, and day-to-day its not really that different but stuff like Photoshop and video editing the quad core is much more comfortable at working.
I'd say the 8500GT is better, as it is a dedicated desktop card. The MacBook will have faster and more RAM though! -
I'm mainly going to use the laptop for light work, surfing, and maybe sometimes image and graphic design.
Also, quick unrelated question - does the Macbook have an ambient light sensor? -
No, the faster RAM won't compensate for it, when the graphics and processing power is needed. But the processor in the MacBooks are already quite good, yeah. Its just when you're comparing video converting on the MacBook and desktop, then the quad core is faster for sure. -
-
-
Hardware-wise, the most noticeable difference (in general use) will be the hard drive speed, which is generally quite a bit slower for laptop hard drives.
-
My desktop vs a Macbook?
Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by chyidean, Nov 3, 2008.