The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous page

    Nvidia 9400M performance on New Macbooks. how fast?

    Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by Phil, Oct 14, 2008.

  1. jadb91

    jadb91 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Hey guys I don't really understand all this benchmark comparison stuff and how it relates to playing graphics intensive games. so my question is what is the most graphics demanding game that the new macbook (2.0ghz) can run. crysis (highly doubt), cod4, counter strike, pacman?
     
  2. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    lol pacman. It scores 2277 in 3dmark06 in 1024*768. Playing Crysis would only be possible at the lowest settings.

    It performs very similar to Ati HD3470 and Nvidia 9300M GS with DDR3 RAM. (a little bit over 2000 in 3D Mark06 at 1280*720)
     
  3. Xirurg

    Xirurg ORLY???

    Reputations:
    3,189
    Messages:
    7,375
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
  4. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    I'm no gamer myself but I thought 18fps frames per second is not really playable?
     
  5. Tony

    Tony Nissan ftw!

    Reputations:
    364
    Messages:
    1,193
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Crysis is surprisingly very playable at around 20fps
     
  6. Xirurg

    Xirurg ORLY???

    Reputations:
    3,189
    Messages:
    7,375
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Cysis is even playable ~16 FPS interesting,right?
     
  7. Sarn

    Sarn Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    For 13" I think these two LGs win, the LG P300 has an 8600M GS and the LG P310 has a 9600M GT (exact same spec as the higher spec MBP). Currently I'm torn between the P310 and getting the new MBP.
     
  8. john_ri

    john_ri Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    so it's expected WoW would run on full settings ?

    maybe not in cities tho?
     
  9. Stone825

    Stone825 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    404
    Messages:
    2,439
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    It will run Crysis on medium to high on 1920x1200 at around 40 fps. It's a very powerful card.
     
  10. Vision33r

    Vision33r Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    19
    Messages:
    162
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Most of the eye-candy stuff can be turned on I bet, but the AA stuff will probably be limited to FSAA 4x max and sub 20 fps.

    While cards like 8800m GTS can do FSAA 8x and get respectable fps.
     
  11. Joplin

    Joplin Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    This is a big claim you make here and I beg to differ. Unless you provide some solid proof there's no way I believe the 9400M will run Crysis at THAT resolution on medium-high. No.
     
  12. Tony

    Tony Nissan ftw!

    Reputations:
    364
    Messages:
    1,193
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Lol he was being sarcastic...
     
  13. Paul

    Paul Mom! Hot Pockets! NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    759
    Messages:
    2,637
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Just an FYI, I tried the Civ IV Mac demo and it ran nearly perfectly at native res and max settings. Little bit of slowdown as the camera pans, but it's never below what looks like 15 fps.

    I have to study for two quizzes tonight, but I'll try out some more demos as I get time. Keep in mind they will be Mac only games as I don't currently have a copy of Windows laying around to install on here. If I ever do, I may load up The Orange Box and let you know.
     
  14. Stone825

    Stone825 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    404
    Messages:
    2,439
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Haha yea I knew someone was going to think I was serious. Anyways... The 9400GT should be able to Run WOW pretty well, but not on full settings. My friend plays on his MBP with the X1600 and he runs it fine on medium settings. You might be able to get away with high but I'm leaning towards medium. I am a framerate nazi though so I like to keep everything running 45+ at all times.
     
  15. ttv

    ttv Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    137
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Apple has never prided itself on gaming, and doesn't build systems optimized for gaming. Their systems are optimized for productivity in design, graphics creation, video production, etc...

    The whole platform works with the OS to create a machine that will perform fantastically with less "spec" than Wintel machines.
    I have quad core G5 with "only" 2gigs of ram and it smokes.
    It will run XP better, faster, and more stable than Dell systems we have as well. My G5 will start and be ready to run XP in 1 minute.
    Most Wintel systems, optimized for XP, can't even do that.

    If anyone wants a powerful gaming setup, then you're barking up the wrong tree with a Macbook. At least go with the entry level MBpro.
    It has the onboard graphics and the new dedicated GT card from Nvidia.
    The system will use the onboard graphics in low graphic use like surfing, email, office suite, etc...
    If you are doing more graphic intensive things like photo manipulation, video editing/processing, etc... you can boot the system with the dedicated graphics card.

    Booting into Windows will use the dedicated GT card.
    When the new Snow Leopard OS comes Mac says that it will use the graphics onboard & card to optimize performance even it's not video related.
    Interesting. We'll see how that works.
    If it will do that, them I'm sure there will be a way to use the onboard graphics engine along with the dedicated card to improve graphics performance all around.
    Apple is forward thinking, and the way they build their products is top of the line. That in itself costs money.
    When my Wintel coworkers and friends actually look inside the G5 or mac laptops they are amazed and impressed with the actual construction.
    Yeah, it looks like overkill, but it takes materials, effort, time, and money to build that kind of quality.
     
  16. Paul

    Paul Mom! Hot Pockets! NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    759
    Messages:
    2,637
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    How are you running Windows on a G5? Virtually?

    That doesn't seem like a very fair comparison.
     
  17. Stone825

    Stone825 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    404
    Messages:
    2,439
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    So much bull**** in that post but i'll let it go... Anyways, I'll try to get benchmarks for the OP.
     
  18. Ayepecks

    Ayepecks Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I was wondering the same thing... how'd you run Windows on a non-Intel Mac system?
     
  19. Jiten

    Jiten Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    They say smoking weed makes your 10 year old G3 Powerbook run Windows Vista faster then any PC notebooks on the market today.
     
  20. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    I'd aprecciate some in game benchmarks.

    Sofar we've seen the 3DMark '06 score in 1280*720 is 2054. Similar to ATI 3470 and Nvidia 9300M GS.

    Can't help but react. I have here a 3 year old Asus laptop with 1,6GHz intel Pentium-M, it boots windows within 34 seconds, and then it's completely ready. With some tweaking I've been able to get to 26.7 seconds. I'm not bs-ing as you can see in the screenshot. Measured with XP Boottimer.
     

    Attached Files:

  21. never2fast

    never2fast Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Haha, very funny
     
  22. Stone825

    Stone825 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    404
    Messages:
    2,439
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    The G5 is a Intel Xeon processor so it will run, it just wont be quicker because honestly half of that stuff won't effect the boot time. I can get a Quad Core CPU, 6GB Ram, 9800GT, 750GB 7200RPM for $1150 :).
     
  23. drfelip

    drfelip Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    43
    Messages:
    334
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  24. kattahn

    kattahn Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    powermac G5's were not intel xeons....they were IBM dual core G5's, and the quad core version simply used 2 chips...the current powermacs use intel xeons, but the G5's were most certainly not "xeons" .... and most certainly couldnt run bootcamp to load windows

    Also, ive had a windows 2000 machine trimmed down to 17 processes @ boot that comes up in ~20-25 seconds...
     
  25. Ayepecks

    Ayepecks Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
← Previous page