So, I'm pretty sure Orbicule is better for the MBP, but let's hear what everyone thinks. Please no comments about using a chain to keep laptops safe or not leaving it unattended or how neither would be useful or other common sense stuffHowever, if you have a legitimate security point (i.e. letting a 3rd party software company remote access to your system, etc.), please make it
![]()
Undercover:
Pros:
Uses iSight.
Simulates hardware failure.
Displays your message on screen to 3rd parties if necessary.
Uses firmware password to prevent HDD format.
Cons:
No EFI integration. Firmware Password won't prevent rewriting of HDD via another computer.
Belgium company; smaller; connections with local law enforcement in US not necessarily as extensive? (unknown).
LoJack:
Pros:
Based in Canada, better connections with police in US?
Erases HDD at your request if necessary.
Larger market share? - i.e. advantages of scale?
Cons:
No Mac-specific integration at all. BIOS integration doesn't work on Macs either.
Further thoughts:
Since LoJack uses the same install file for both OSX and Windows, what would happen if I install it both on my Boot Camp partition and the OSX partition? Would this possibly be an "advantage" of LoJack? Undercover doesn't work in Windows - would this be an easy way to bypass it if one boots directly into Windows?
Any more?
Orbicule Undercover vs Absolute LoJack
Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by taelrak, Aug 13, 2007.