The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous page

    Question from a Thinkpad user part II

    Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by diver110, Nov 24, 2009.

  1. Vogelbung

    Vogelbung I R Judgemental

    Reputations:
    3,677
    Messages:
    4,067
    Likes Received:
    699
    Trophy Points:
    181
    It's absolutely possible - I'm currently trialling W7 x64 on all of my 17-inchers. However one of the issues I think - and there are many, which you may not necessarily realise especially at first if all you've had are POS's - is that there are significant thermal considerations on the MBP for starters.

    Assuming you bought the 17-inch for example, the 9600MGT runs at speeds actually approaching a 9500MGS in Windows, due to downclocking - necessary to maintain some degree of thermal equilibrium. As you may know, there are Quadro optimisations in Solidworks in terms of visual presentation and you won't get these with a Geforce card either.

    So the question is, do you need the OS X and do you need the pretty more than making a compromise on your application performance, the dependability / roadability of your machine and support? The Macbook is not a better performance proposition for Solidworks compared with even much, much cheaper (almost a thousand less) computers - and the same sort of money will buy you a machine with a bona fide FX2700M, better build quality for real-life working, more stable performance and capability to uplift support to on-site.
     
  2. surfasb

    surfasb Titles Shmm-itles

    Reputations:
    2,637
    Messages:
    6,370
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    If you need to do 3d modeling, I don't see the need to go away from a Quadro.
     
  3. crazycanuk

    crazycanuk Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,354
    Messages:
    2,705
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    56
    for solid works stick with a Quadro or FireGL video card.
     
  4. Xirurg

    Xirurg ORLY???

    Reputations:
    3,189
    Messages:
    7,375
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Can you proof this?
     
  5. Vogelbung

    Vogelbung I R Judgemental

    Reputations:
    3,677
    Messages:
    4,067
    Likes Received:
    699
    Trophy Points:
    181
    PROOF! PROOF! I DEMAND PROOF!!!!!!!!

    Now why is it I never say that?
     
  6. weinter

    weinter /dev/null

    Reputations:
    596
    Messages:
    2,798
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    All new Nvidia GPUs (Since 6000 Series) downclock their frequency in Windows 2D Desktop Mode.
    Check PowerMizer.
    If you want proof you can see, download GPUZ in Windows, look at the frequency during Gaming and idling on Desktop.
     
  7. Xirurg

    Xirurg ORLY???

    Reputations:
    3,189
    Messages:
    7,375
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
  8. dtwn

    dtwn C'thulhu fhtagn

    Reputations:
    2,431
    Messages:
    7,996
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    206
  9. Vogelbung

    Vogelbung I R Judgemental

    Reputations:
    3,677
    Messages:
    4,067
    Likes Received:
    699
    Trophy Points:
    181
    I did look closer at this - and it does ramp up correctly in Vantage and Crysis, so it looks like I was mistaken.

    It's just that for my design apps, even with complex models - no, and for CS:S it would stay at ~390mhz on occasion, leading me to think it was downclocked or saving itself. It's a shame I don't have another machine with a 9600M to see if the same behaviour manifests itself.
     
← Previous page