The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Save overclocking limits (temps)

    Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by thegsrguy, Jul 27, 2007.

  1. thegsrguy

    thegsrguy Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    24
    Messages:
    812
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    My new MacBook Pro (2.2GHz, 128MB 8600GT) has just undergone some quick overclock testing. My results are below. The 8600GT seems to overclock well, but I'm curious what are the safe limits for temperatures.

    Ignore the weird scores, the benchmarking was run at 1280x854 or some goofy resolution like that. The first test is with factory clocks.


    core/mem
    466/632 = 3150 (factory)
    500/660 = 3320
    525/685 = 3375
    550/702 = 3480


    550/700 is effectively 18% core/20% memory overclock. Temps peaked at 90C during testing, according to an nTune history graph.

    Is 90C a safe temperature? At factory clocks, the temps peak at 88C. Not bad...only a 2C increase for a 20% performance boost.

    What's the safest I can honestly push the temperatures up to?
     
  2. thegsrguy

    thegsrguy Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    24
    Messages:
    812
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Just pushed things a bit harder:

    575/730 = 3575

    Temperature never went above 90, once again.
     
  3. minxshin

    minxshin Notebook Consultant NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    41
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Check ntune threshold temps, I know for mine it's (the GS) it's 127 C it seems high, but it should be ok.
     
  4. wave

    wave Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    813
    Messages:
    2,563
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    90° should be fine if it is the peak. I am guessing average is around 85°?

    You still have alot of room to push the core up. 600mhz should not be a problem.
     
  5. minxshin

    minxshin Notebook Consultant NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    41
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Btw thanks for these results. I was wonderin what the 128 clock speeds were and what scores they would be getting in 3dmark06. Repped. Btw.. what drivers are you using?
     
  6. bobz99by

    bobz99by Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    21
    Messages:
    148
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Lol stalking you thegsrguy

    So is 3150 the score you get with 165.01 without OCing. If so thats crazy. With 162.18 I get around 2850.
     
  7. thegsrguy

    thegsrguy Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    24
    Messages:
    812
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Again, note that I'm running at 1280x854, not 1024x768 or 1280x1024. This is because I have the free version of 3DMark.

    Peak is 90, yes. The fans are going full-bore at that point, the temps seem to average around 86-88 degrees. Mine also has the 127 threshold, though I don't know if I trust that, especially given the MBPs relatively small size.


    Only problem is that the overclocks don't stick if I reboot...kinda lame.
     
  8. thegsrguy

    thegsrguy Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    24
    Messages:
    812
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Drivers are the 165.01, BTW. These seem to be the most stable, though not necessarily the fastest
     
  9. masterchef341

    masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook

    Reputations:
    3,047
    Messages:
    8,636
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    206
    curious- are you using ntune to overclock?

    if not, which driver are you using?
     
  10. thegsrguy

    thegsrguy Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    24
    Messages:
    812
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Yes, as I stated up top: nTune to overclock with the 165.01 drivers.
     
  11. hsuntiger

    hsuntiger Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    are you running vista 32 bit, xp or vista x64? i can't get my clock speeds to stick using 163.31 drivers in vista 32 bit
     
  12. thegsrguy

    thegsrguy Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    24
    Messages:
    812
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    32-bit. I have the same thing -- clock speeds reset to defaults when I reboot the machine.
     
  13. jaymester

    jaymester Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Hi all, just found this thread, I did a search for nTune and the 165.01 driver on google but nothing came up, can some one direct me to them so I can try it on my MBP with bioshock I just got :)
     
  14. Cinner

    Cinner Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    12
    Messages:
    326
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Here you go. That's the XP version. Be sure to download the driver and the modded inf (extract the driver and put the inf in the folder you extracted).
     
  15. Xander

    Xander Paranoid Android

    Reputations:
    1,321
    Messages:
    1,455
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    jaymester, What model MacBook Pro do you have? Does your MBP have an nVIDIA GPU (8600m GT)?

    If you have a 2.2/2.4 GHz MBP (with 8600m GT) you can use laptopvideo2go.com drivers, but you don't want to use 165.01 for BioShock. ForceWare 163.44 was released specifically for BioShock. Use 163.xx drivers for the best results with BioShock. I've only personally tested the 163.44 XP drivers so I can't recommend the others. Make sure you read the QuickStart Guide and follow the installation instructions. Peace.

    ForceWare 163.xx Drivers:

    163.44 XP 32bit
    163.44 Vista 32bit

    163.69 XP 32bit
    163.69 Vista 32bit

    163.71 XP 32bit
    163.71 Vista 32bit

    As for overclocking, you won't be able to overclock any 163.xx driver with the current version of nTune (5.05.47.00). As far as I know, only RivaTuner 2.04 can overclock 163.xx drivers (though not all).