I was following the leopard threads on a couple of forums when it just came out. My understanding was that half the people advised against switching to leopard, and half the people recommended it. It was sort of a very mixed feeling.
Now that a couple of weeks has gone by, can someone give an update on the overall consensus on the leopard? My school is finally selling it, for $99CAD, which is a decent price.
-
Well, keep in mind that the 10.5.1 update just came out, which addressed a lot of the things that people had issues with, and many of the people advising switching to Leopard were generally saying to wait until that 10.5.1 update came out.
-Zadillo -
10.5.1? So soon? Was it a major update? I guess I'll go read about it now...
Sort of off topic here: is it better to upgrade from Tiger to Leopard, or should I format my HD and then install Leopard? -
10,5,0 is not good to me.
One of the guys at the office installed it and it was terrible. Not only it was slower (against what I've been reading in reviews), but also it had several compatibility problems. Some printers don't work and Vectorworks 12.5 had terrible usability problems. I believe that last issue has been adressed by vectorworks though.
Anyways, he had to switch back to tiger because he had to go on working with VW, and there's no easy way around it. You would imagine that you have an option to go back like in windows, but you don't... He had to backup everything and do a clean install of tiger. Quite inconvenient (and so much for the mac vs pc ads that cash in on people switching back from vista). -
Err, pointless Apple ads aside, there's no *real* option to revert back to a prior version of Windows XP from Vista.
Anyway, it's almost always best to do a clean install. You can lose quite a bit of compatibility and performance otherwise (this applies for both Windows and OSX).
Short of specific application compatibility, there isn't really a reason to intentionally boycott Leopard if you're willing and able to spend the money of course. Leopard probably isn't really a giant step forward, but it's also probably not a step backward either.
So the real question is whether any applications you absolutely must use are fully Leopard compatible or not. If your apps will be fine, then you might as well upgrade whenever you feel like it. -
Does anyone have any comments on the printer installation process (check out both links)? Do you know if (username) Wooky is still around?
** UPDATE: Apparently it works on Leopard, or so I read on the apple forum. -
Works great for me.
MBP 2.16 C2D
Adobe CS3
Cinema 4d XL 10
sees my old HP 6MP fine
Just check your major apps for compatibility.
The main things I heard were "obscure workflow issues" the CS3 video apps (After Effects and Premiere). I use After Effects "normally" and it works fine.
Acrobat Professional does not work and is awaiting a January update.
The UI is noticeably "snappier" for me. -
Works great for me too. Sure, there are a few annoyances, like the too translucent menu bar and stacks, but it also has a high number of improvements. On my C2D Macbook it runs great, even with 1GB of RAM.
-
Leopard > tiger imo. Pretty much just as stable but tons of cool new stuff.
-
I would say definitely upgrade to Leopard. Its not as revolutionary as Apple marketed it to be, but its still a great upgrade with lots of new features that will be really helpful and convenient.
I'm only still on Tiger because I'm broke.
-
-
The key to the best results is to use Disk Utility and do a reformat and install. If you choose any other option you may have issues. Even though other options are there DON'T do anything but erase, reformat and install. -
Raymond Luxury-Yacht Notebook Consultant
-
-
Raymond Luxury-Yacht Notebook Consultant
-
-
I hate to sound like the odd one out, especially when I do not even own a Mac, let alone Leopard, but here is a view point from eweek.
He sure sound very disappointed.. -
hoolyproductions Notebook Evangelist
without wanting to sound like to much of a fanboy, that eweek review is saying that leopard is a major step backward because of
1) the firewall (doesn't Tiger have the same issue anyway?)
2) some stuff I cant even follow about download speeds
3) some software which isnt fully compatible yet
Real problems for sure (apart from the one I dont understand lol), but it doesn't seem like enough to write off the whole OS -
Again, it's senstionalism. Yes, OS X 10.5 was not perfectly flawless - but pretty much every issue mentioned in that piece was actually just resolved with the 10.5.1 update that just came out.
The idea that these problems amount to a "rotten" release is just really out there though.
-Zadillo -
I wonder how much has to do with putting every "new" release down (not like they contributed to the development of the software); take for e.g. Vista, there have been endless criticisms about it ever since it was released. [and rightlfully so, IMO, it is really a step back from XP...will elborate later]
Even Ubuntu Gutsy, with the enormous user functionality improvements it has, still gets carrots from people.
I guess it all depends on how far you want your OS to go.
S -
well then I've made up my mind ... time to find the dollas!
-
.
-
-
-
.
-
, I won it), I don't think I stand a chance trying to get into the Up-To-Date program
.
-
-
Are you on that list?
Liar! -
So I guess, stealing a Mac without also stealing Leopard disc is a no go. How daft could one be...LOL!
-
-
What's the overall consensus on Leopard?
Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by sepandee, Nov 16, 2007.