The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    exFAT

    Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by taelrak, Jul 13, 2011.

  1. taelrak

    taelrak Lost

    Reputations:
    860
    Messages:
    2,979
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Revisit of an old old problem that hasn't really changed that much over the years:

    External drive to be shared between Windows (Boot Camp) + OSX. Used solely to store media for consumption, with very little to no editing. No special permissions required. Size limitations of FAT32 unacceptable.

    Options:

    exFAT
    Pros: full read+write from both Windows and OSX.
    Cons: it's a FAT-based system; any other cons?

    NTFS (+ ntfs-3g)
    Pros: Great Windows read+write capability.
    Cons: No write capability from OSX unless I install ntfs-3g. Some write lag under ntfs-3g.

    HFS+ (+MacDrive)
    Pros: Great OSX read + write capability.
    Cons: No write capability from Windows unless I install MacDrive. MacDrive is a hideous piece of software.

    Willing to expend the effort and money that any of these options involve. Willing to consider other options, but not if the cost (time or money) is significantly higher.

    Thoughts? I'm interested in efficiency, fragmentation, wear, speed, performance, error rate, etc.
     
  2. KCETech1

    KCETech1 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,527
    Messages:
    4,112
    Likes Received:
    449
    Trophy Points:
    151
    I tend to go the NTFS and ntfs-3g route
    if your not needing huge amounts of speed my favorite is a good NAS adaptor such as
    NAS 3.0 Adapter from Addonics
    and just connect to it by network shares.

    but exFAT works just fine.
     
  3. Karamazovmm

    Karamazovmm Overthinking? Always!

    Reputations:
    2,365
    Messages:
    9,422
    Likes Received:
    200
    Trophy Points:
    231
    File system - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    wiki is quite good when it comes to pc things, take a look.

    I went for exfat since I use the externals for various windows machines at home and at work

    for thumb drives I usually go for the fat32, since I dont use anything more than a 4gb drive