The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous page

    6970m in G73JW - fail :(

    Discussion in 'ASUS Gaming Notebook Forum' started by svl7, May 8, 2011.

  1. tudordewolf

    tudordewolf Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    83
    Messages:
    74
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Gaming hard, my JH lasts about 45 minutes - on a ~80 watt-hour battery, that's 106 watts.
    The power pack is designed to handle a theoretical high draw from the laptop AND charging the battery. (imagine being not able to both charge your battery and play at the same time, only having to chose 1 or the other... Asus wouldn't do that)

    Also, the Asus power pack has been shown to provide up to 170-some watts (running both prime95 and furmark) from the wall... though it does get hot.

    Therefore, I'd think the power pack won't really matter unless you find yourself charging AND gaming hard on a new GPU. My jh rarely goes out, and the battery to me is an integrated UPS for power outages...

    As for 6970m in a JH, see my other thread, I expect to have results on success/fail by the 20th (or so)
     
  2. svl7

    svl7 T|I

    Reputations:
    4,719
    Messages:
    3,758
    Likes Received:
    134
    Trophy Points:
    131
    I use a 920xm and the 6970m with the standard 150W PSU and it works so far... but I don't now as much about the G73 as about the M15x... the bigger screen probably draws a bit more power and the second hard drive as well...

    I think power shouldn't be a problem with a 720/820qm, and if the 920xm draws to much power you can still lower the multi and TDP/TDC a bit.

    ...but first of all let's see whether the card works at all...!!
     
  3. @tilla

    @tilla Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    321
    Messages:
    528
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I had measured the power draw of my G73JH and the Medion X7811.

    X7811 (i7-720qm):
    Prime + Furmark: ~146W
    But there is a throttling of the GPU while running both. Also with 150W AC.

    G73JH (i7-740qm)
    Prime + Furmark: max. 149W
    Just Prime: 73-82W (differs through brithness level and other sucking lights)
    This 82W is with full brightness, wifi, keyboard light etc.
    Furmark ran fullscreen in FHD! Windowed max. 142W.

    Only Furmark results:
    Furmark windowed stock clocks 5870m (700/1000): ~116W
    Furmark windowed overclocked 5870m (800/1100): ~125W
    Furmark fullscreen overclocked 5870m (800/1100): ~132W
     
  4. svl7

    svl7 T|I

    Reputations:
    4,719
    Messages:
    3,758
    Likes Received:
    134
    Trophy Points:
    131
    I guess you measured with a kill-o-watt or something similar, keep in mind you still have a measurement error of about ±10W, also since you measure between wall and PSU you also measure the power which gets dissipated by the PSU itself.

    Anyway, these numbers are pretty insane... did the G73 with the 920xm come with a bigger PSU?
    ~150W whith prime and furmark and a i7 740QM probably explains why the system of my buddy which upgraded the CPU to a 920xm crashes from time to time when he's overclocking the CPU... not enough power.
     
  5. tijo

    tijo Sacred Blame

    Reputations:
    7,588
    Messages:
    10,023
    Likes Received:
    1,077
    Trophy Points:
    581
    I don't think it will be possible to run a 920xm Oc'ed to death with a 6970m in the G73 with the stock power adapter. Given the amount of heat it dissipates, i'm guessing a good portion of the power draw at the wall gets converted into heat. Anyways, if the 6970m works in the JH, expect me to test it with my 180W adapter.
     
  6. Yiddo

    Yiddo Believe, Achieve, Receive

    Reputations:
    1,086
    Messages:
    4,643
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Another reason why im hanging out for the 6970M before switching to the 920xm the 720qm will work very nice with the 6970M at full pelt.
     
  7. cayocayo

    cayocayo Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    14
    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    JH+6970m is it compatible?
     
  8. Yiddo

    Yiddo Believe, Achieve, Receive

    Reputations:
    1,086
    Messages:
    4,643
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    105
    We should be a little closer to finding out by next week according to this post.

    We can only hope.
     
  9. LegendaryKA8

    LegendaryKA8 Nutty ThinkPad Guy

    Reputations:
    871
    Messages:
    969
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    But this begs the question: other than the 180W Targus adapter, are there any other, larger power bricks that will fit the G73? If I'm reading this right, the stock adapter is 150W, 19.5V, 7.7A with positive polarity. I know that if I were to run a 920/940XM and a 6970M in my JH, I'd want some more breathing room than 180W just to be safe. Does anyone know if the Targus brick is the only other choice?
     
  10. Yiddo

    Yiddo Believe, Achieve, Receive

    Reputations:
    1,086
    Messages:
    4,643
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    105
    What did you use to measure the consumption? Is there software that can measure this?
     
  11. svl7

    svl7 T|I

    Reputations:
    4,719
    Messages:
    3,758
    Likes Received:
    134
    Trophy Points:
    131
    @LegendaryKA8: In case the mobo really allows you to draw more power than 150W with a higher rated PSU then you could still hack something together, not too difficult. Some cuts, a bit soldering and some shrink tube = FrankenPSU :D
     
  12. WaffleBoy

    WaffleBoy Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    73
    Messages:
    761
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Can't you try to upgrade the SW series? I guess the SX maybe will work.
     
  13. LegendaryKA8

    LegendaryKA8 Nutty ThinkPad Guy

    Reputations:
    871
    Messages:
    969
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I was considering that route. I think the 230W PSU from the Dell XPS M1730 would be a good candidate, if it meets the voltage/amp specs of the G73. When it comes to this sort of thing it pays to be careful. I think everything at this point is speculation until someone gets the 6970 into their system; at least those with the 920/940XM CPUs aren't having power issues with their OCs.

    Edit: It looks like the M1730 brick outputs 19.5V, so that's a go, but also puts out 11.8A. I'm not really certain if it would work, but if a beefier power supply is needed this one might be worth a shot. Another possibility I just thought of might also be the G74 brick once it comes out.
     
  14. tijo

    tijo Sacred Blame

    Reputations:
    7,588
    Messages:
    10,023
    Likes Received:
    1,077
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Actually, the power that an adapter can output is P (W) = V x I (A). As long as the voltage output is the same, it's fine. The amperage will be determined by the required power draw. 11.8A is the max the adapter was designed to handle. What i'm really curious about is the power output at the tip of the adapter when the G73's CPU and GPU are fully used. I wouldn't be surprised if the adapter's efficiency is around 80% or maybe even less considering the amount of heat it dissipates when gaming.
     
  15. LegendaryKA8

    LegendaryKA8 Nutty ThinkPad Guy

    Reputations:
    871
    Messages:
    969
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Well, that goes to show how much I know about the basics of electricity, haha. It's been waaaay too long since I've delved into these sorts of things. However if the voltage is what needs to be the same, it looks like the M1730 brick might be a good candidate for modification if need be. I am also curious as to how the current power adapter will handle any sort of increased load, or if a more powerful adapter will be necessary.
     
  16. oqix

    oqix Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    What about this one? I think it's good candidate for mod too. HP 230W Smart (AT895AA). Specs: Output: 19.5V / 11.8A (230W). It has good price 50€.
     
  17. svl7

    svl7 T|I

    Reputations:
    4,719
    Messages:
    3,758
    Likes Received:
    134
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Yes, but let's wait and see whether the 6970m works in the JH... :D
     
  18. Cheeseman

    Cheeseman Eats alot of Cheese

    Reputations:
    365
    Messages:
    1,296
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    A candidate maybe, but what makes you think the connector will even fit the G73's DCIN?
     
  19. oqix

    oqix Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30

    That's why I wrote the candidate for the mod. Replacing the connector would take only a few minutes.
     
  20. DH48

    DH48 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    342
    Messages:
    610
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Cant wait to hear the results.


    Rep+ for the person testing the card in the JH
     
  21. @tilla

    @tilla Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    321
    Messages:
    528
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I measured with a simple but pretty acurate kill-o-watt.
    So it is of course the AC-side.
    Notebookcheck tested the 2630 in the SW which draws little more. And there is throttling.

    Hehe, let the race begin.
    I'm on a good course of get one too. :D
     
  22. tijo

    tijo Sacred Blame

    Reputations:
    7,588
    Messages:
    10,023
    Likes Received:
    1,077
    Trophy Points:
    581
    At least if it doesn't work in the G73JH, your GX740 will probably make friends with it. Here's hoping it work though.
     
  23. tudordewolf

    tudordewolf Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    83
    Messages:
    74
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    HW Monitor can give you info on the CPU power consumption.
     
  24. Yiddo

    Yiddo Believe, Achieve, Receive

    Reputations:
    1,086
    Messages:
    4,643
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Yeah I have a few programs that provide me with the CPU voltage and wattage but I was wondering if there is a program that monitors the entire wattage drain? I doubt it but before I buy an amp meter thought I would check. :)
     
  25. ALLurGroceries

    ALLurGroceries  Vegan Vermin Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    15,730
    Messages:
    7,146
    Likes Received:
    2,343
    Trophy Points:
    331
    batterybar should show your discharge rate on battery - not sure about on AC power. I don't think the power draw is reported by ACPI when it's on AC.
     
  26. Yiddo

    Yiddo Believe, Achieve, Receive

    Reputations:
    1,086
    Messages:
    4,643
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    105
    This is what I thought I know there are a few sums you can do to work out the amount of drain but I would rather know exactly what draw im getting because I think my adaptor is underpowered for the overclocks I have at full load.

    I am using a standard Asus adaptor but as its from the US the fellow I bought it from had another convertor plug that the 2 pins go into and then it goes into a UK socket. I will pick up a meter and check it out.
     
  27. @tilla

    @tilla Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    321
    Messages:
    528
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    You will see the charge rate while on AC.

    Short test with BatteryBar (high perf. profile, full brightness).
    Prime: ~76W
    Furmark (windowed): ~100W
    Furmark+Prime: max. const. ~124W

    The BIOS doesn't let the system draw too much. I saw peaks of 145W while running Furmark and Prime, but the CPU quickly throttelt down to 933MHz (lowest freq.). I guess it's a protection for the battery.
     
← Previous page