The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous pageNext page →

    Asus ROG G501 announcement

    Discussion in 'ASUS Gaming Notebook Forum' started by Oxford_Guy, Feb 4, 2015.

  1. TomJGX

    TomJGX I HATE BGA!

    Reputations:
    1,456
    Messages:
    8,707
    Likes Received:
    3,315
    Trophy Points:
    431
    Yeah Asus 15" laptops are always overpriced.. The 17.3" ROG laptops are actually well priced...
     
  2. kmera

    kmera Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
  3. dlinfiniti

    dlinfiniti Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
  4. Oxford_Guy

    Oxford_Guy Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    655
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    41
  5. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,431
    Messages:
    58,186
    Likes Received:
    17,895
    Trophy Points:
    931
    I would never pre-order without full details.
     
  6. 777light777

    777light777 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    16
    AC Adapter: "120W AC Adapter.
    Output : 19V DC, 6.3A, 120W.

    What GPU could work in that range? o_O

    Why the delay, if it has an 860m REBRAND! :mad:
     
  7. pato

    pato Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    56
    Messages:
    463
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Because Nvidia must first release it in high enough quantities? Maybe they wait for the GDC in March, where Microsoft will hopefully present the final DX12 specification. I then hope to hear from Green and Red which products might be fully compatible.
     
  8. Oxford_Guy

    Oxford_Guy Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    655
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Who/what is "Green and Red"?
     
  9. pato

    pato Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    56
    Messages:
    463
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Green = Nvidia, Red = AMD ;)
     
  10. Oxford_Guy

    Oxford_Guy Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    655
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Aha! Makes sense now! Thanks
     
  11. TomJGX

    TomJGX I HATE BGA!

    Reputations:
    1,456
    Messages:
    8,707
    Likes Received:
    3,315
    Trophy Points:
    431
    Yes most likely the 960M... Just another 860M rebrand.. Fail from NVIDIA and Asus..
     
  12. Oxford_Guy

    Oxford_Guy Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    655
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Boo! If it was much cheaper, it wouldn't be so bad, but at that price I'd expect at least a 965M
     
  13. kmera

    kmera Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Yeah the only way this could be worth the money is if the battery life is amazing...
     
  14. Oxford_Guy

    Oxford_Guy Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    655
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Well it does have large battery...
     
  15. kmera

    kmera Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Yeah on paper. Can't wait to see the first reviews once it's released.
     
  16. sockfish

    sockfish Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Don't forget, you can't overclock the 9xxm anymore. Not sure what the advantages of the 960m are going to be, but not being able to overclock is going to be a huge disadvantage to even the older 860m. Not sure if this makes sense on why it was delayed. On the plus side, it looks like the price has gotten a little cheaper.
     
  17. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,431
    Messages:
    58,186
    Likes Received:
    17,895
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Nvidia are likely just allowing old inventory to be cleared.
     
  18. lewdvig

    lewdvig Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,049
    Messages:
    2,319
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    66
    How trustworthy is ROG Marshall? He implies the 960m is not a simple rebrand of the 860m (gm107) but rather the gm204 they use in the desktop 960 GTX with a cut down the shader count.

    http://rog.asus.com/399392015/g-ser...15-inch-gaming-laptop-with-4k-pcie-ssd/?tp=14

    "I'm pretty sure DP 1.1a is wrong though - should be 1.2a (or whatever GM204 supports)"​

    It might have more cores than the 640 cores in the 860m (between the 860 and 965 counts ~ 6 SIMMS = 768 maybe?).
     
  19. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,431
    Messages:
    58,186
    Likes Received:
    17,895
    Trophy Points:
    931
    I think he meant maxwell instead of GM204 because that would be silly, if you cut it down any more a GM107 is going to be more efficient.
     
  20. RayDawg

    RayDawg Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    38
    Messages:
    187
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Let me get this straight, the GX500 wasn't considered good enough, so it's been improved and is now the G501?
     
  21. Oxford_Guy

    Oxford_Guy Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    655
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    41
    I preferred the smaller size of the GX500 personally, without the numpad
     
  22. 777light777

    777light777 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    16
    The GX500 is now the G501, the only changes in build are 21mm vs 19mm (thickness), larger keyboard, and side facing speakers instead of top.

    They are the same size... ;)
     
  23. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,431
    Messages:
    58,186
    Likes Received:
    17,895
    Trophy Points:
    931
    If you have to delay a release you would make any improvements to keep it in relevant in the market after all.
     
  24. ledzepp14

    ledzepp14 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    34
    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    31
    what's the deal with this.. is it ever coming out? haven't heard of an update in a while.
     
  25. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,431
    Messages:
    58,186
    Likes Received:
    17,895
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Asus usually keep their cards close to their chest on full release dates.
     
  26. ledzepp14

    ledzepp14 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    34
    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    31
    doesn't look like there'll be an update considering how much of a waste of time that nvidia presentation was.
     
  27. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,431
    Messages:
    58,186
    Likes Received:
    17,895
    Trophy Points:
    931
    GPU announcements are in the next show they are doing like a full break down of Titan, so that's where I would look for any info.
     
  28. ledzepp14

    ledzepp14 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    34
    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    31
  29. Loqque

    Loqque Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
  30. ledzepp14

    ledzepp14 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    34
    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    31
  31. stisa

    stisa Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    16
  32. Nand@

    Nand@ Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I was hoping the 965 at least
     
  33. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,431
    Messages:
    58,186
    Likes Received:
    17,895
    Trophy Points:
    931
    The reason for the delay will have been clearing out inventory of a high volume chip so no one was left with a large backlog of chips they could not sell.
     
  34. franzerich

    franzerich Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    121
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Yeah... 60% less is really bad. Differences were rarely that bad in the past.
     
  35. TomJGX

    TomJGX I HATE BGA!

    Reputations:
    1,456
    Messages:
    8,707
    Likes Received:
    3,315
    Trophy Points:
    431
    Yes something like 60-70% less powerful then stock 970M... Not surprising at all.. The 960M is just a rebadged 860M with slight OC...
     
  36. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,431
    Messages:
    58,186
    Likes Received:
    17,895
    Trophy Points:
    931
    It's the recent reluctance fot nvidia to use the mid chip (eg GK106 took ages and GM206) in mobile.
     
  37. Nand@

    Nand@ Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    31
  38. sockfish

    sockfish Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Well that's severely disappointing. Anything with a 960m in it is a multimedia notebook at best, which would belong in the Y50 and Acer notebooks.

    Not something you should find in a 2015 gaming branded notebook. Nobody understands the reasoning behind this going into a ROG product or the Razer Blade "Pro".
     
  39. TomJGX

    TomJGX I HATE BGA!

    Reputations:
    1,456
    Messages:
    8,707
    Likes Received:
    3,315
    Trophy Points:
    431
  40. ledzepp14

    ledzepp14 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    34
    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    31
    exactly what i did. was excited for this asus, till specs got confirmed. got the 1080p blade now and pretty happy with it. would've preferred a 15"screen tho.
     
    TomJGX likes this.
  41. ChrisAtsin

    ChrisAtsin Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    100
    Trophy Points:
    56
    It has a 512 PCI E SSD, a 4K screen, 16 GB of RAM as well as a 96 wh battery for the same price as the 1080p Blade with 8 GB of RAM and a 256 SSD as well as a smaller 70 wh battery. It's not that bad of a deal if you don't want the extra graphical power or if you want a larger screen.
     
  42. ledzepp14

    ledzepp14 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    34
    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    31
    yea, but for being marketed as a new ROG machine... this is pretty weak. i would've been instantly sold if this had the 970 in it. it looks like a fantastic media notebook tho.
     
  43. sockfish

    sockfish Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    It's not a bad deal at all, it's a premium product for sure with a price tag that isn't bad. But as an ROG machine, a 960m is just a puzzling decision. If it was 20% less powerful than the 970m then this would be a very good contender. But at 60% less it's hard to imagine why the original plan as a GX500 with a 860m didn't make more sense.
     
  44. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,431
    Messages:
    58,186
    Likes Received:
    17,895
    Trophy Points:
    931
    It would have to be a totally different design to take a larger GPU. ROG is not about delivering the bleeding edge at the cost of all else.
     
  45. ledzepp14

    ledzepp14 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    34
    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    31
    i dunno.. if the Razer Blade can house the 970m in a smaller package, then it's just puzzling why Asus decided not to go with it in a larger housing. and i think Asus should've just left it out of the ROG label and just made it as a regular multi-media model. this is as baffling as Razer's decision to use the 960m in the new "Pro".
     
  46. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,431
    Messages:
    58,186
    Likes Received:
    17,895
    Trophy Points:
    931
    A loud and very hot machine you would not want on your lap ;)
     
  47. ledzepp14

    ledzepp14 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    34
    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    31
    i was one of the very concerned about the Razer's heat and fan noise before becoming an owner (you can see my many questions in the Razer forum section), and now that I've tried/owned both the QHD+ and FHD versions (kept the FHD version).. i can say that the heat and noise isn't that bad. yes it can get hot after a few hours of heavy gaming, but most sub 17" will as well. but i believe that if it's not that bad in the Razer's smaller chasis, then it would've been fine within the larger 15.6" body of the Asus. during the weekend, i played Mass Effect 3 on ultra, and the fans barely went full blast. granted it's an older game, but i was surprised by it. Skyrim on ultra with a lot of mods also was fairly quiet. i'm just disappointed with Asus, as i was excited about the potential of the G501, and it would've been an instant buy for me.
     
  48. ChrisAtsin

    ChrisAtsin Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    100
    Trophy Points:
    56
    There have been ROG machines with 850M GPUs. The 960M is still a very good midrange GPU. These laptops are built differently. Razer has been able to fit a 970M in that chassis by sacrificing features that the ROG supports. Maybe Asus just couldn't manage it.
     
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2015
  49. sockfish

    sockfish Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Same here, it would have been an instant buy for me too, and that says a lot since there are MANY very good options out there right now. I still use Asus' UX51VZ with the 650m that is over two years old now and was hoping this would be a great follow up.

    Maybe it's more on Nvidia than Asus, since a GPU that was less capable than the 970m would have been fine, but IMHO the 965m/960m were just too much of a compromise and there is nothing in between.
     
  50. ledzepp14

    ledzepp14 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    34
    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I probably would've gotten it, if it had the 965m in it instead.
     
← Previous pageNext page →