The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    1.83 or 2.0 CPU in a W7J?

    Discussion in 'Asus' started by reicaden, Jul 2, 2006.

  1. reicaden

    reicaden Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I plan to order a W7J....

    it comes standard with a 1.83 CPU duo core.

    Does anyone know if upgrading to a 2.0 instead will:

    1). Create much more heat? i mean... "alot" more heat?

    2). draw alot more power? (i dont mean an extra 5 minutes over the course of a full battery drain. I am talkin like... an easy 30 minutes or so knocked off?)

    and..

    3). Show any significant improvement in performance? (i will use this computer mainly for websurfing, note taking, and light gaming... very little in the way of graphics or video editing....)



    -Thanks for any responses!! :)

    (my assumed answers...)
    1). i think it probably wont be much more heat, if any.

    2). i get a feelin that a significant amount of battery might change, like 20 or 30 minutes...

    3). i probably wont feel the difference at all xD... but i could be wrong.
     
  2. MYK

    MYK Newbie NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    447
    Messages:
    1,792
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I think all it would do is cost you more. I agree with your assumptions except with the battery, I don't think it will drain a lot more.
     
  3. fenderboy

    fenderboy Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    The performance increase will be unnoticeable performing day to day tasks, battery life will not be reduced to any noticeable degree, so it's not really worth the upgrade unless you're running scientific programs for solid number crunching.

    I say save your money and upgrade to a Merom processor next year.
     
  4. coriolis

    coriolis Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,319
    Messages:
    14,119
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    455
    Pretty much, unless you do some heavy CPU usage, you will barely notice it.
     
  5. who8mahrice

    who8mahrice Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    375
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  6. PROPortable

    PROPortable Company Representative

    Reputations:
    418
    Messages:
    8,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    performance difference is little to none, although I wouldn't go any more high end in such a tight system anyway........ Not only that, but changing it is going to void Asus' global warranty...... even though you're still paying for it.
     
  7. reicaden

    reicaden Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    thanks, i guess i'll stick with the 1.83 then, if the boost is only 9% from a 1.66 to a 2.0.... then a 1.83 to a 2.0 must be near zilch, lol.

    thanks for the thread linking :)
     
  8. PROPortable

    PROPortable Company Representative

    Reputations:
    418
    Messages:
    8,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    ... and that's 9% in benchmarks..... in the real world, 99% of people will never be able to tell the difference between a 1.6 and a 2.1... not just now, but 2-3 years down the road...
     
  9. naszero

    naszero Notebook Consultant NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    35
    Messages:
    162
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Not worth the losing the warranty.
     
  10. loopdot

    loopdot Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Also, you can wait until next year when your warranty expires and (hopefully) put in a Merom. Based on that, the 2.0GHz seems even less essential.
     
  11. ProntoR2

    ProntoR2 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    21
    Messages:
    190
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Not to mention it's going to throttle down the CPU clock speeds to facilitate what you're doing. The extra bit of GHZ does nothing but make it sound cooler when you tell people who don't know anything about computers what's inside it.
     
  12. yoseph

    yoseph Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Back in the day when cpu's were only 200mhz, yeah an extra 200 would be very noticable, but with the current speed of processors you'll be hard pressed to notice the difference from an extra 200mhz.

    To put it a different way, you would see speed increase in apps, but I'm thinking it would be a difference of seconds, not minutes. :eek:
     
  13. ProntoR2

    ProntoR2 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    21
    Messages:
    190
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I seriously doubt he'd even notice the difference. If anything it would be his mind "telling" him it's faster than actually seeing a difference. That is unless he's using statistical analysis programs or some other number cruncher.
     
  14. Mikeoo17

    Mikeoo17 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    261
    Messages:
    731
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Keep in mind, a 1.83 duo core is about the same as a 2.0 Pentium M. (If i read the post correctly)