Thought we'd get a database going here to compare our systems to those of others with the same model. If you'd like, state the model of your computer, your 3DMark settings, and your score.
Asus G1S running XP
3DMark 06 default settings
4007 3DMarks
Also, is this a good score? The last one I saw was 3800 something so I thought this was pretty good. I am running the newest driver build from nVidia through laptopvideo2go so that might have something to do with it. It's 165.something
-
Crimsonman Ex NBR member :cry:
Yeah, that's a really good score, i think it compares to the 8700
-
pretty nice score, much better than my c90s
-
What's the average CPU Score? I noticed the CPU tests were alot choppier (Read ALOT) but I think I got the average 1800 something that I've seen in all the 3Dmark scores.
-
G2S running Vista ultimate, newest drivers.
4328 3Dmarks in 1152x864. Strange resolution?
A bit overclocked i get 5198 3Dmarks. -
got like 3000 with c90s at the 1028x1024 default settings.
-
I got 3402 for the c90s with XP under 1200x1024 and still some gadgets on
in standard mode
-
3280 points.
163.11 drivers, Vista 32 bits. -
Under Vista I got 3900 @ 1024 x768 and under XP I think I got 4100.
-
3632 with the new xxx.44 drivers on stock-clocked G1S. 1280x1024 in Vista Ultimate x86
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=14&XLID=0&UID=10656039 -
3005 (1280x1024) with an Asus C90/2.6ghz/3GB@266mhz
/Nvidia 162.22 Drivers
Vista Ultimate x64
Fresh install, no overclocking, no programs/services stopped -
Asus G1S
2.2GHz
3GB RAM
160GB 5400rpm HD
8600GT
Vista Home Premium 32bit
Using free version of 3DMark06 which locks resolution at 1280x1024
Nothing overclocked, just using the 163.44 drivers: 3DMark06 score = 3861 -
Damn nice scores nearing the 8700GT, I would like to see someone overclock the 8700GT and see what they get
-
Thats score im use for daily use...
Driver 165.01 -
1024x768 @ XP
3dmark 2005 - 10010
3dmark 2006 - 5882 (my record is 6023) @ 86ºc
With overclock and drivers 163.44 -
ViciousXUSMC Master Viking NBR Reviewer
Remember 3dmark06 requires 1280x1024 to give a official and comparable score. If your screen can not do that resolution your scores are not reflected correctly.
For that reason 3dmark05 may be a better test to compare various systems as it uses a lower resolution that many more people's computers are capable of displaying. -
Imations, what mods etc do you have running to be getting 7-800 higher than the other highest scores? Are you overclocked? I'm running the 165 drivers even though I can't put the computer to sleep with them... (400 points is 400 points, I can just shutdown for that... Until they come up with a patch.
-
I got 3900 with G1s everything stock (163.44 drivers)
-
why is the c90s scoring so bad!! its got more of an advantage because of the true c2d!
how odd...
will post my c90s scores once its built -
Kinda surprised no one mentioned this yet, the 8600GT in the G1s is GDDR3 which is why it's much faster, since its clocked at 700mhz, compared to all the other 8600GTs which us DDR2 and clocked at 400mhz~.
-
Looks like the overclocking makes quite a difference. I'm assuming thats only overclocking the GPU? which i perceive to be the bottleneck.
-
-
Yep, Vicious is right. Those not running 06 with 1280x1024 need not apply as their scores are simply not compareable.
Those of us with C90's will have our purchases validated if ever an 8800 series mobile MXM part is released. Then we'll dominate 3DMark 06. But not yet. -
but for now we just have to be happy that we have true c2d!
but the g2 has fancy lights... -
-
If they make an MxM 8800 but it is MxM III or IV it will be worthless to a C90s owner. -
Well ASUS is going to lose quite a few customers and have their reputation shot a bit if they don't deliver.
-
ViciousXUSMC Master Viking NBR Reviewer
Im pretty confident there is a card out now thats MXMII that will beat the G1S scores. The HD 2600XT should be faster.
Its a smaller die processing and hopefully is uses GDDR3 for the memory, also the entire hardware design of the 2600 is more powerfull than the nvidia card if it has proper drivers. -
It's a rather negligeable boost for those already with 8600m GT's though. Unless it can score in the 7-8000 3DMark 06 points. And as such, if it be only be a small performance bosot at the $200-300 that i will likely cost, it is useful for no one but new C90S owners, which rather makes it a bit pointless. We're looking for something down the line, next year, that will give us a significant graphics boost, like an 8800m, for the $300-$400 that it will then cost.
-
With an Asus Z84Jp with GF 7700go
Stock drivers in 2006 I get 3012
GPU clocks are 585/473 -
Score: 3259
CPU: [email protected]
GPU: 500 Core/500 Mem
Driver: 158.22 w/ modified INF -
ViciousXUSMC Master Viking NBR Reviewer
swoley will have the lead for c90 by far. He hit over 4200 on one of his runs. Benchmark only settings I would never run what he had as an everyday overclock. I think it was 550/550 with the newer high performance drivers, and he had to modify the gpu bios for the overclock.
-
New high for me- 4038 This is using the TweakForce 163.44 drivers.
Attached Files:
-
-
-
-
3DMark06 - 3712
C90s
overclocked 500/475
cpu oced to 2.762 -
3Dmark 06, default settings
Asus G1S
Vista Ultimate : 3895
XP : 4000
no overclocking. -
-
3dmarks06 result: 3890
Screen Resolution: 1280x1024
G1S A1 with 3GB Ram
NVIDIA Driver: 162.22
No overclocking
Question: I guess the score is quite standard with G1S, but my screen resolution is not good under 1280x1024 (the circle become ellipse) so i bring it back to 1680x1050 (circle looks like real circle), Whats your screen resolution and what's your color setting used?
The only good about Sony SZ is the screen and if you guys compare to G1S screen SZ is more perfect screen. Maybe somebody try to change the default of color setting (or gamma setting) that improve G1s screen.
Thanks -
New c90s: 3dmark06 is now at 3711.
c6600 22 watt,seagate160/7200 3gb RAM, turbo is in overclock mode with cpu temps at 56C, gpu overclocked 500/500 with temps for gpu at 74. All asus stock drivers running xp and bios 601. -
-
laptop: c90s
3dmark06: 3476 (basic version so everything as it came)
OS: vista ultimate 32 Bits
gpu driver: stock (101.** i believe)
cpu: oc 15% -
3DMark 06 default settings got 4757 (I guess thats good)
using Modied Nvidia Vista drivers 7.15.11.5607 from Laptop2go, only driver I could get to work with Quatro 2500M wth good results -
new results for my G1S - all settings defaults in 3Dmark06
Vista Ultimate - 3Dmark06 : 3925
forceware 163.44 -
Sorry for "Nathan P" Im too late to reply u PM
I never do something with my g1s only update drivers to 165.01. n OC little bit... ^^
I hope my reply solve u problem
Thanks -
Update - I was able to connect my g1s to an external monitor that was 1280x1024 capable and i got 4752 - 2006 marks, drivers 156.55 and windows vista, i didn't bench on windows xp but i'll say 4900 /5000
-
I can get my C90 on 3DMark'06 up to 3535.
e6700 (Gaming mode 10% OC)
bios 601
3GB DDR2 667
8600M GT (500/500 on 101.17)
How are some of you bumping up to 3700? What drivers you guys using? -
thats one weird background
3DMark 06 Scores
Discussion in 'Asus' started by Nathan P, Aug 25, 2007.