Asus A8Jm benchmarks

http://translate.google.com/transla...j+benchmarks&start=10&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N

Some benhmarks of the a8J. Here are some of the results:

3DMark2001 1024*768 17706 || 1280*800 15773
3DMark2003 1024*768 6701 || 1280*800 5648
3DMark2005 1024*768 3617 || 1280*800 3272
3DMark2006 1280*800 1918

EDIT: Sorry shouldn't be the A8Jm i started going through the review in whatever the translation google provided, these seem to be the results of the ATI x1600 512MB, but I guess it should give a good idea of what we should expect from teh nVidia Go 7600 as well

 

Not bad scores at all. I was expecting about the same performance of the X1600 but it looks a litle bit less.. I guess i'll be going with the S96J... I've had Nvidia cards for the past 2 graphics generations and I wanna go back to ATi for their sexier, more advertised cards and features
We all know Nvidia is ownage when it comes to gaming, but ATi has a lot more "bragging rights" due to the fact that their GPUs are more expensive than Nvidia's

 

Did you read his post at all? He said the results are for the X1600......

 

Well, i didn't read the edit part cuz i was typing my reply up when he edited it

 

The A8JM does perform slightly better.

Here are my benchmarks:

3DMark2005 1024*768: 3969
3DMark2006 1280*800: 2366

 

what drivers/settings are u using. On stock without formatting windows i am getting 3831

 

My benchmarks. Stock drivers, no changes to the system other than removing Norton AV.

3DMark2003 (1024*786): 8826
3DMark2005 (1024*768): 3834
3DMark2006 (1280*800): 2281

 

yeah so the 3 marks difference in 05 is nothing to worry about

 

hey man. why in the world is the 3dmark2006 mark for the go7600 around 1000 points more that of the x1600?

 

gusto5 edit you post - you know what I mean (x1600 -> 2200 not 1200 )

 

that can be facilitated....for a fee

 

Mine's 2287 -> 3d06 -> 1280 x 800

 

And that's for GF7600 or X1600?? Stock, OC?

 

damn! beaten by 2 marks!

 

eheheh... lucky me... does it really matter though? Can someone tell me how much difference really matters? eg.. aamit's up there gets 2330 something... it's a 50 point difference. Should we be concerned?

 

Yes it matters!! He is FIRST!!

 

The only change I've made was to set the Image Settings to Performance ( default is Quality ) in the NVIDIA Performance & Quality Setting, I guess that made the difference.

These are the results with default settings:

3DMark2005 1024*768: 3843
3DMark2006 1280*800: 2287

 

I changed the Image Setting in NVIDIA to Performane ( default is Quality ), I guess that made the difference.

These are the results with default settings:

3DMark2005 1024*768: 3843
3DMark2006 1280*800: 2287

 

thanks followed ur advice i just hit 3972, not bad still not crossed 4000

 

just on a side note, is anyone's keyboard getting louder, on the left side, like the shift/capslock, a, z, fn area buttons? They seem to be louder than the rest of the keyboard, and i cant seem to figure out what it is.

 

Got 2360 in 3dMark06 after following Aamit's advice

 

my tab seems to have gotten louder, cos i use alt+tab a lot i noticed it.

 

yea, those are the keys that i mainly use to play counter-strike. Does anyone with keyboard experience knwo if this only gets worse, or is this as bad as it will get?

 

This is pretty interesting actually.. Gustos A8Jm is equiped with 1gb of 533 ram while Darrick is equiped with 2gb of 677 ram and is only beating Gusto by 2 points. I guess RAM really doesn't matter at all in this benchmark. I wonder what the results would be if we used a true game benchmark like half life 2 or battlefield 2. Which recent games do you two own? Maybe we could benchmark the two systems head to head and see what type of real world difference the added ram will give.

I would jump in there and benchmark my A8Jm, but the post office hasn't been so kind as to deliver it yet. Also since I haven't had a decent computer for around five years, my most graphic intensive game would probably be warcraft 3? Anyone down for comparing the fps difference. Thinks... 468 fps vs 839 fps at max resolution

 

In benchmarks there can be no diffrence, but in games 2gigs of RAM will have influence for sure. Specially in BF2, FEAR, Oblivion.

 

I have 2gb of ddr2 667 as well and i beat aamit's 3dmark05 (presumably he's using 1gb of ddr2) by 3 marks.
I have half life 2 and play counter strike source regularly. If i run the built in benchmark for source i get around 117fps.

 

I'm confused, which was the 36mark05 results for the A8JM with the nvidia 7600 512mb, and which was the score for the x1600?

 

kengou... I believe all the marks here are for the A8Jm. Some are 3dMark05 and some 3dMark06, hence some in the 2000's and some in the 3000's

 

I thought the original poster posted benchmarks for an ati x1600, am I wrong?

 

the scores on teh first post of this thread are for the A8J with X1600. Then the ones from me, gusto and darrick are all nvidia 7600