I'm about to order a Vostro 1500 and would just like to check what other options I have in the same price range before I go through with the order.
This configuration seems to compare well to the Vostro, except I'm not able to tell if the monitor is any good. I do not want a crappy screen.
-
Well, what kind of screen do you consider to be good? High resoliution, wide viewing angles, crisp? F3Ka screen is only average in all of those parameters, but I wouldn't call it crappy. And I definitelly don't know how it compares to the Vostro screen, couse I haven't seen it. Try to look for some other F3 series reviews, F3sv for example, because almost all screens tend to be the same.
-
The F3Ka & F3SA are 1280x800 though. while the F8SV/F3SV are 1440x900 or 1680x1050.
The screen res is what made me change idea. the F3Ka/F3Sa were SO perfect. $1420CAD with 3yrs extended warranty! -
Can you tell me a little about this? -
Well like all notebooks, it has a tn matrix, which means that only 16.2mln colors are actually rendered, so it's not as good as some desktop monitors, but not bad either. The viewing angles are bad however, I've seen a lot better notebook screens in this aspect, and thats major pain for me, because I am used to CRT monitors. Overal, if you have a chance, I say go with the Vostro. It should have better battery life, atleast not worser screen, better graphics probably...
Asus F3KA monitor quality? (AS014C, HD2600, 160gb, TL60)
Discussion in 'Asus' started by hjj, Sep 25, 2007.