The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous page

    Benchmark table of Asus notebooks

    Discussion in 'Asus' started by MilestonePC.com, Oct 18, 2005.

  1. Goren

    Goren Notebook Virtuoso NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    951
    Messages:
    2,739
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    seems like CanadaSys has updated with the battery life. 5 min difference when both are being used in the same conditions. What also further confuses things is that the S96J, under similar conditions, could go up to 4! the bigger screen would require more energy I assume
     
  2. MilestonePC.com

    MilestonePC.com Company Representative

    Reputations:
    160
    Messages:
    1,973
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    One important issue make the battery( 8 cell and 6 cell ) life only 5 min. difference, looks like most of the confused people ignored, the fan on W3J kicks in more frequently than A8Jm, that will count alot battery life I believe.

    If S96J is like you mentioned with longer time, I guess one reason will be it is more spacious than W3J, save some cooling work, let me do a S96J battery test under the same use today and update it for you later today.
     
  3. mystery

    mystery Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    6
    Messages:
    271
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    OMG thank you SOO Much for testing the S96J, i really appreciate it, I'm getting mixed numbers on its battery life. Some say 3hrs, some 3.5hrs..Some even up to 4:|
     
  4. Goren

    Goren Notebook Virtuoso NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    951
    Messages:
    2,739
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    ah yes, the fan! does this mean the W3J produces more heat as well? :confused:
     
  5. MysticGolem

    MysticGolem Asus MVP + NBR Reviewer NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    145
    Messages:
    1,047
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    alright, great, thanks for the info Danny, this helps alot :D

    So now we can see that the whole package of the laptop depicts batterylife.

    Now with Danny's experience, he noticed that the W3J's fans were on more consistently than the a8jm, meaning heat and cooling affects batterylife.

    More heat = more fans usage = less batterylife. Aside, another contributor to heat is lower dimensions in size, and thickness, the thinner a laptop is the greater the chance it will run hotter (Dedicated GPU) thus causing battery life to be lower cos of fan usage.

    So fans usage is 1 contributors, dimensions is another, the bigger the laptop is the less cooling it may need.

    So when comparing the a8jm and W3J the dimensions are bigger for the a8jm, plus it has more features (webcam DVI) than the W3J.

    Lets assume the S96 from Danny's test get more batterylife than the W3J and a8jm. In theory it shouldn't because of the bigger screen. However, if you look at reviews so far, the machine is real cool. Meaning the fans usage is low. Thus causing an huge increase in batterylife.

    Aside, the dimensions once again are bigger than other notebooks of that calibre, and you all know what 15.4" are in competition with it.

    All in all, fans...hehe, we can't calculate how much fans take up in power, but we know the more they spin the worse it is for the laptop in general.

    And YES the W3J is hotter than the a8jm, the W3 series has always been hot.

    There needs to be better cooling solutions, that don't cause fans to spin as much as they are in current notebook, but this will evolve as technology gets better.

    Time will tell.

    Thanks,

    MysticGolem
     
  6. MilestonePC.com

    MilestonePC.com Company Representative

    Reputations:
    160
    Messages:
    1,973
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    We had S96J from about 2 weeks ago, because too busy, now it is
    the first time for me to play with it, also do some battery test.

    Having heard of different battery life, from 3-4 hours, this is normal
    because everybody is using under different circumstances, I am trying to
    do a fair test, to test different models under the same use.

    I just tested A8Jm and W3J with mid brightness and wireless on, external
    optical mouse, typing and internet browsing, I got 2 hours 50 min and
    2 hours 55 min.


    Now let us go to the topic,the S96J, other than battery life, I will also
    give some of my impressions.

    I planned to test S96J under the same way as I tested W3J and A8Jm, but
    right after I started, I found it will be hard for me to do that, when I set
    S96J to mid brightness, it is really dark, of course I can still read it with
    no problem, but my eyes don't feel comfortble, so I raised the brightness all
    the way to 80%, I will say 80% on S96J gives me the same brightness of 50%
    on A8Jm and W3J, let's wait and see under the same actual brightness (not just
    set them to their own mid-brightness), what kind of result we can get, lower
    than 80% brightness makes my eyes tired.

    By now it has been 40 minutes, I don't feel very confident, because the battery
    says 1:47 hours (71%) Remaining.

    S96J is fairly quite, quiter than A8Jm and W3J, the vent locates at the right
    back conner, not at the side like W3J and A8Jm, the fan goes on less as well.
    The same with A8Jm and W3J, the right half, both the palm area and keyboard
    get warm, slightly warmer than these two 14" models.

    I feel the keyboard of W3J and A8Jm is better than S96J.

    The 15.4" WXGA is not bad at all, if you don't really need open many windows all
    together, you can comfortbly stay with 15.4" WXGA, I will give you guys a screen shot
    at the end of writhing to show you the detail of fonts and photo.

    The two click buttons on the touch look like the cheapest part of the whole barebone.

    I don't know how other tests got 3-4 hours, for me I cannot get that, it is because I set the brightness to 80%, but lower than this is too dark for me, and 50% of A8Jm and W3J is absolutely fine for me. Now it has been 1 hour 45 min, it says 32 min (22%) left. Even I got 2 hours battery life (Don't forget my external USB optical mouse is like a small lamp,
    lights up all the time), I will still say for this price and specs, it is a very good deal.


    :D This little bad mouse is stealing my battery power :D

    [​IMG]


    I will come back later for the final result.

    After 2 hour 7 min, I got warning, battery low, connect power adaptor, 8 min ( 6% ) left.
    Hope this will help.


    Here is the screen shot, the actual display is better than this because screenshot lost a little bit color.


    [​IMG]
     
  7. MysticGolem

    MysticGolem Asus MVP + NBR Reviewer NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    145
    Messages:
    1,047
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    hmmm interesting, this is just weird lol.

    Could 30% difference in screen brightness attribute to a decrease in of batterylife like of 1-2 hours compared to other battery tests of users here on the forum?

    Anyways, thanks for the info Danny.

    I would like to hear some discussion about these new findings :D

    Thanks,

    MysticGolem
     
  8. Goren

    Goren Notebook Virtuoso NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    951
    Messages:
    2,739
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    are the new graphics cards more power consuming?
    Models from last year, ie w3v, z70v, z71v, etc seem to be capable of reaching 4 hours. But it doesn't seem to hold same for the refreshes. Not just Asus, but alot of other brands too (IBM, HP, etc).
     
  9. coriolis

    coriolis Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,319
    Messages:
    14,119
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    455
    The brightness is definately there, it's insane how a 100% brightness S96j is not as bright as a 50% brightness W3j!
     
  10. MysticGolem

    MysticGolem Asus MVP + NBR Reviewer NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    145
    Messages:
    1,047
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Goren a lot of people undervolted their laptops to hit 4 hours, other than that they were getting roughly 3.5 hours.

    wow, your right cori, hmm i wonder how good the viewing angles are for the S96j.

    Also, ATI said there would be a 10-15% boost in batterylife in their X1xxx series compared to Xxxx series.

    Meaning the culprit is prolly the yonah and the fact that it can't be undervolted at low settings. Um, there may have been an increase in heating problems, thus causing the fan to spin more, which drains the battery more.

    That's all i can think of.

    Thanks,

    MysticGolem
     
  11. coriolis

    coriolis Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,319
    Messages:
    14,119
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    455
    Viewing angles aren't bad on both, though the W3j screen is brighter, the viewing angles are worse then the Z96j.
     
  12. mystery

    mystery Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    6
    Messages:
    271
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    The screen in that pic does look pretty dim for the S96J, especially for it being at 100%, but some people are claiming its a very bright and nice screen for some reason :confused:
     
  13. coriolis

    coriolis Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,319
    Messages:
    14,119
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    455
    Or the W3j screen is just too darn bright ;)
     
  14. MilestonePC.com

    MilestonePC.com Company Representative

    Reputations:
    160
    Messages:
    1,973
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I believe it was because they didn't have the chance to compare side by side with other models.
     
  15. kengou

    kengou Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I'll add my 3Dmark05 score for my S96J here I guess. I got 3961 with the latest omega drivers. I found the screen to be pretty bright actually, I run it usually at 50% very comfortably.
     
  16. dadash

    dadash Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    2
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    asus A7D (Z83) 17" Turion1.8Ghz 2GBRAM 120GBHDD X700ATI
    Tested with asus own recommended drivers
    3DMarks2005-2588
    3DMarks2003-6659
     
  17. jacen83

    jacen83 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    has anyone managed 4000+ (3dmark05) on a W3J?

    Or played Oblivion with any success. (Couldnt get a definitive answer from the Oblivion forum)
     
  18. skidawg

    skidawg Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    3dmark05 - 4210 with latest mobility cat 6.7 stock speeds

    3dmark05 - 4867 with mob cat 6.7 at 515/540 overclock (just for fun, don't really need to run it that fast)

    Haven't played oblivion but hl2 and Winning Eleven (soccer) both smooth as butta!!

    By the way this is on the latest refresh model...
     
  19. D1g1talk

    D1g1talk Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5

    3dMark05 - 4409 (standard frequencies)
    5045 (overclocked @520/1100Mhz)!!!!!
     
  20. coolhamoood

    coolhamoood Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    15
    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    ok ok ok ok
     
  21. LatinoHeat

    LatinoHeat Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    209
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    ok went to the link for ASUS benchmark scores.
    mines are as following:
    Calculate Pi to 2 million digit 1m 15s
    PCMark05 Did not try yet
    3DMark Score 4280

    It's a W3J T2500@ 2.0 Ghz.

    I noticed that the score listed for 3dMark is 4722 when mines is only 4280. Why is my score so low for compared to the one listed. Is it worth mentioning I updated the ATI CCC to 6.8. How could I increase the score? If I buy a gig of RAM, will how much will the score change.

    I know the score is not that significant, but I love the feeling of the score the higher it gets.

    And yes, it is connected to the power outlet. Any ideas on how to raise my score.
     
  22. kiety

    kiety Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    awsome work! thanks
     
  23. conejeitor

    conejeitor Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    28
    Messages:
    652
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Can you add Z96J?
     
  24. okitsmedan

    okitsmedan Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    hi guys, i'm very dissapointed and confused as to why my Z63A takes 3 whole minutes to calculate to 1M with SuperPi

    1.86Ghz
    1.00GB RAM
    60gb 4200rpm

    please advise, this is already second time it's happened, and I just reformatted today
     
  25. agemar

    agemar Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    hello,

    I recently bought an Asus A8jn in a shop in the Netherlands. I got the one with the T5600, the Core2Duo 1.83 ghz. Further specs: 1 G ram, graphics N7300 with 256TC. HD 120 Gb sata 5400 rpm. OS XP-MCE. etc etc.

    Using super pi to calculate pi to 2M digits I got the following score: 1 m 13s

    PCMark05 and 3dmark05 scores will follow......
     
  26. Gator

    Gator Go Gators!

    Reputations:
    890
    Messages:
    1,889
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Ah waaaaahaaat? What're your stock speeds for the X1600?

    Mine is 450/370 stock for a score of 4000 in '05, and 500/400 for a score of 4500. So as you can see, I'm a little concerned for your card's health (as well as yours).
     
  27. thegooner

    thegooner Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    43
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I just got an Asus F3Ja.

    Specs and stock performance numbers in sig :)

    Stock clocks for the X1600 are 446/347

    Will post some overclocked bench results when I get time.
     
  28. slo007

    slo007 Notebook Enthusiast NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    2
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Did you turn off all the applications running in the background? My numbers went from 59 secs to 25 secs when I deleted most of the apps running in the background.

    Are you plugged in to the wall? If the computer is running off batteries, it will slow down the processor to save power. Sometimes, if the settings are incorrect, it will stay in "economy mode". Check it out in the Control Panel, under Power Options.

    Good luck!
     
  29. coriolis

    coriolis Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,319
    Messages:
    14,119
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    455
    Unstickied and added to the ASUS FAQ.

    Discussion is still welcomed here!

    Credits are given where its due of course.
     
← Previous page