I am more or less confused on the differances between the two. I havent downloaded chc yet, b4 i do i was wondering what i will gain using chc over the windows stock power scheme settings. I can under-volt my w3v to about 800mhz and get over 5 hours battery life @ idle with this setup..... So whats the main differance?
thanks for any input...
josh
-
-
CHC has many settings including load balancing for different voltages and speeds. It also allows for checking hdd temp, video card temp and controlling the graphics card speed. Mainly it is alot more flexiable then only windows. As far as getting more then 5hrs out of the notebook i doubt it. That is excellent battery life.
-
I noticed a huge diference in fan and HD temp using Power4gear and CHC, P4G did keept my Hd cool running, while CHC roasted it a 65C doing almost nothing. think twice, Asus design that software to control everything the way they tested it, stock
-
Do you mean underCLOCK to 800MHz, or undervolt? Because Windows has no program to undervolt the processor...
Most notebook users have lots of success and actually swear by CHC and its capabilities. I, for one, am one of those users.
With CHC, I can control the fan behaviour, underVOLT my CPU so that it runs cooler, and monitor temperatures. It really is a great all-around program. -
i think you right under-clock the processor...
-
-
that IS undervolting... but what I meant was that Windows has no capabilites to undervolt (other than between stock voltages) by itself; you need a program to do it (e.g CHC...RMClock...etc.)
-
Ah, I gotcha...yeah, Windows power management is pretty weak...
-
before all of these crazy notebook tweaking programs came out, Windows power management was quite sufficient... -
...but then came the tweaks!
CHC vs. Stock power scheme
Discussion in 'Asus' started by jiggerjosh, Sep 14, 2005.