The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    G72gx rbbx05, or rbbox09?!

    Discussion in 'Asus' started by Brh1980, Oct 28, 2009.

  1. Brh1980

    Brh1980 Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Trying to decide between the rbbx 05, and 09.

    Basically, is it worth the $150 to go from a 5400 rpm to a 7200rpm HDD,
    and from a p8700, to a q9000.

    Anyone have any info that can help me out? I've used both machines, and like them both a lot. Will mostly be used for gaming, and some video editing.

    Anyone who owns them, what are the pros/cons for each?
    Thanks in advance!
     
  2. Lanaya

    Lanaya Templar Assassin

    Reputations:
    656
    Messages:
    2,577
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    56
    the quadcore( Q9000) will be better for video encoding, by far, and will be better in future games with quadcore optimization. the P8700 will be better in games/applications that can only make use of 1 or 2 cores.
     
  3. VoltaicShock

    VoltaicShock Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Most games only support 2 cores and with the P8700 being 2.5 it is the better choice right now (at least for me it is).

    If I was doing video editing I would have gotten the Q9000.
     
  4. Abula

    Abula Puro Chapin

    Reputations:
    1,115
    Messages:
    3,252
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    106
    As EIement said, if you gona be using apps that support quads then go for the 09, HDD isnt that much different, when i had my G71 the drive wasnt slow or at least i coudlnt tell the difference when i got the g51 with the 7200rpm, i would probably save the extra $100 and spend it on a SSD later on and use the 500gb 5400rpm for storage, at least that was my plan until it got stolen forcing me into a g51.
     
  5. SoundOf1HandClapping

    SoundOf1HandClapping Was once a Forge

    Reputations:
    2,360
    Messages:
    5,594
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Games that use only two cores are eaten for breakfast by a 2.0 GHz core 2 duo.

    Games that beat up a 2.0 GHz C2D are eaten for lunch by a core 2 quad.

    Get the quad.
     
  6. PopRoxMimo3

    PopRoxMimo3 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    82
    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    4 is better than two. Because you can tip over on 2 wheels.

    in other words...

    QUAD QUAD QUAD
     
  7. Melinapayne

    Melinapayne Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    161
    Messages:
    770
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    i completely disagree. They work coompletely differently, PopRoxMimo3.
     
  8. Soviet Sunrise

    Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,140
    Messages:
    6,547
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Explain. 10char
     
  9. Amnesiac

    Amnesiac 404

    Reputations:
    1,312
    Messages:
    3,433
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Heh, that is the best reasoning behind the dual vs quad I've ever seen. :D
     
  10. Melinapayne

    Melinapayne Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    161
    Messages:
    770
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  11. Soviet Sunrise

    Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,140
    Messages:
    6,547
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Thank you, Melinapayne. You have passed the test.
     
  12. Melinapayne

    Melinapayne Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    161
    Messages:
    770
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    omg sarcasm?