How strong ur GTX260M can go?

the highest i try is 620/1020/1520. any higher? i wanna over 11000 in 3D mark 06, my laptop is G51VX-A1 with Q9000

 

You're memory clock is too high.

I was at 625/1550/975 yesterday but then I accidentally the whole GPU. lul

 

i wan to increase the benchmark only, how to set my clock?

 

See sig. I think my core/shader clocks are the highest here.

 

It is highly unrecommended to raise the memory above 1k.

 

can anybody give me SetFSB? mine cannot use, keep on asking to enter the number

 

Lol you would probaby want your cpu going higher to hit above 11k in 3dmark dudeman. I hit 12k plus and my cpu got 3200 alone.

 

What?

No, no no. Memory increases only lead to more heat and less gains. The memory is the most susceptible to heat, so raising it that high is pretty foolish.

Core/shader clocks net you the most performance increases.

 

notice the "un-"

 

I think you're both saying the same thing. How about "It is highly recommended to not raise the memory above 1k." Or, better, "Raising the memory above 1k is not rcommended."

 

You guys sure got told. http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?p=5175428

 

Um, he already said "Highly unrecommended to go over 1k".

I guess you read it wrong somehow.

BTW MXM2 standard defines max speed as 800DDR while MXM3 is 950DDR max.

Reference: http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-260M.14559.0.html

 

Also note that if you're trying to max out 3Dmark, the score is pretty heavily CPU-bound. I remember upgrading from an 8800GTX to an SLI rig with 2 cards - and my 3Dmark barely bumped. But my actual framerates in games soared.

It was only when I got an E8500 and OC'ed it to 4Ghz that it made a big difference to my 3DMark. That taught me a big lesson: 3Dmark scores and framerates in real games are only loosely correlated.

 

Enthralling tale, chap.

 

z

As told many many times by me and others in many threads. For instance a 2.3ghz dual core scores roughly 2k to 2.1k while a 3.4 scores roughly 3.2k.

 

Are you at all capable of substantive analysis or contribution - or is it always going to be these snide little nonsense remarks?

The OP is using 3DM06 as his primary metric. Not everyone knows the degree to which 3DM06 is CPU-dependent, and he may be chasing scores via higher GPU overclocks when he really needs to be looking at a faster CPU.

And while it may be "obvious", clearly the OP doesn't know. I, for one, still find it surprising that the supposed #1 benchmark for VGA performance weights CPU scores so heavily.

 

He's basically saying "nobody gives a sh*t" in English English.

 

Fantastic yarn, gentleman.

Thanks for feeding the trolls.

 

You give it to 'em straight. I take your "Cool story, bro" and add a lemony zest to it.

 

am i cool yet?

 

ROFL nice one

 

does it make me cool or a geekhead that i recognize Hercules in that there enthralling picture?

 

Someone gold star that.