The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Same laptop - very different wireless performance

    Discussion in 'Asus' started by Dangerous_Dave, Oct 29, 2015.

  1. Dangerous_Dave

    Dangerous_Dave Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Hi all,

    Liking my Asus N56VZ so much, and having tried other models in search of improvement to no avail, I bought the updated model (N56JN), which differs, so far as I'm aware, only in having a newer 4th gen. Core i7 and a GT840M GPU. The only problem is wireless performance: the new laptop has a much worse wireless signal reception - e.g. right now is getting 2 bars for my main wireless network, where my N56VZ is getting 4 bars sitting right next to it.

    What could be causing this situation, and is there anything I can do to fix it?

    Thanks in advance
     
  2. downloads

    downloads No, Dee Dee, no! Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,729
    Messages:
    8,722
    Likes Received:
    2,230
    Trophy Points:
    331
    Does it have the same wireless card?
     
  3. Dangerous_Dave

    Dangerous_Dave Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I had thought they were both Intel, but it turns out not: the better performing one is Intel, but the worse performer is a Ralink card. Could this be the culprit? It seems odd to me that they would elect to fit a card with such garbage performance to their expensive machine.
     
  4. downloads

    downloads No, Dee Dee, no! Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,729
    Messages:
    8,722
    Likes Received:
    2,230
    Trophy Points:
    331
    Ahh, don't even start me on that. They will select whatever is cheaper. Anyway - Ralink and Realtek are rather poor chips as far as consumer Wi-Fi cards are concerned.
    On another note - those bars you are referring to are based on SNR ratio which is not comparable between different manufacturers (as odd as it might seem), so the fact that one card seems to have batter reception than the other might not actually mean that is the case (although it probably is in this particular case).
     
  5. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,431
    Messages:
    58,192
    Likes Received:
    17,900
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Yes, the best way of comparing would be comparing transfer speeds and what distance you can actually get data.
     
  6. Dangerous_Dave

    Dangerous_Dave Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Cheers - for the purposes of upgrading, can anyone recommend a card that is likely to give me a good signal. The N56VZ has an Intel N2230 in it, which I can get quite cheaply. But is there a better option? (I only seem to have 2 wires to plug into it, not 3).
     
  7. Dangerous_Dave

    Dangerous_Dave Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Went for an Intel 7260 in the end - didn't want to spend too much, and range is most important to me, so didn't bother with the dual band (range) or ac (expense) variants. Not sure if I made a good decision.
     
  8. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,431
    Messages:
    58,192
    Likes Received:
    17,900
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Depends on your router, but if you are sticking with 2.4ghz it would not have really made a difference, no.