The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    W3V 750 Dothan = What Pentium 4 Processor?

    Discussion in 'Asus' started by CalibratedComa, Apr 2, 2005.

  1. CalibratedComa

    CalibratedComa Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    28
    Messages:
    493
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Can anyone tell me what the equivalent Pentium 4 Processor (Desktop?) would be performance wise to the Pentium M 1.86 Sonoma based Dothan processor in the ASUS W3V? (Both running with identical memory)

    ie, Intel Pentium-M 750 Dothan (1.86Ghz; 533mhz w/ 2mb Cache)is equal to or closest performance wise to an Intel Pentium 4 HT 530 (3.0GHz)Processor.

    What about the equivalent in an AMD Athlon 64 Processor?

    Thanks in advance to all who reply [8D]

    (I'm no longer a Newbie, check it out...I'm officially a Notebook Enthusiast! yeah baby, yeah!!! [ :D]
     
  2. CertDude

    CertDude Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    AFAIK, as a general rule of thumb you can multiply the frequency with 1.5 - i.e. 1.86GHz P-M = (roughly) 2.8GHz P4.

    Haven't seen any specific conversion tables around.
     
  3. AuroraS

    AuroraS Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    651
    Messages:
    3,497
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Actually, with the newer 533 FSB Dothan chips, the general rule is to multiply by 1.7-1.8x the speed to get the equivalent P4 speed.
    So it should be about 3.2 GHz P4

    As for AMD... that's a tougher comparison. Dothans are somewhat already equivalent to AMD as they both are "efficient" rather than "frequency" processors

    ASUS M6800Ne, P-M 1.5 Dothan, 512MB Ram, Toshiba Combo drive, Samsung Spinpoint M 40G HDD with 8M cache, Mobility Radeon 9700
     
  4. PROPortable

    PROPortable Company Representative

    Reputations:
    418
    Messages:
    8,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Aurora,

    That is correct....... it's probably closer to the 1.7 multiplier though.

    Thanks,
    Justin
    PROPortable
    www.proportable.com
    [email protected]
     
  5. CalibratedComa

    CalibratedComa Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    28
    Messages:
    493
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Thanks for the responses...no one has any idea when It comes to the AMD processors? [8D]
     
  6. AuroraS

    AuroraS Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    651
    Messages:
    3,497
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Damnit Justin, you've more than doubled my post count [} :)]
    all in good fun though...[ :D]

    ASUS M6800Ne, P-M 1.5 Dothan, 512MB Ram, Toshiba Combo drive, Samsung Spinpoint M 40G HDD with 8M cache, Mobility Radeon 9700
     
  7. PROPortable

    PROPortable Company Representative

    Reputations:
    418
    Messages:
    8,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Well, AMD's have been running their **00+ campaign for the last couple years...... they just basically use that to say their 2.6 ghz (or whatever) is equal or batter than a 3400+ P4... thats what all that is about.

    Thanks,
    Justin
    PROPortable
    www.proportable.com
    [email protected]