The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    w3j and v6j question

    Discussion in 'Asus' started by Chiqui, Feb 26, 2006.

  1. Chiqui

    Chiqui Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Both laptops seem pretty incredible machines but I find them with a bit of lack in processor speed with only 1.66 Ghz. Are these machines going to have more powerfull processors in a near future?
     
  2. GregM

    GregM Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    68
    Messages:
    357
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I might be wrong, but I bet the 1.66 duo is faster than the 1.7 Pentium M. I doubt they should be compared side-by-side - just like the P4 and Pentium M shouldn't.
     
  3. SRD

    SRD Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    133
    Messages:
    2,089
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    a 1.6 duo out performs a 2.13 ghz pentium M. at least in the pie calculation and certain benchmarks.
     
  4. CalebSchmerge

    CalebSchmerge Woof NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    1,126
    Messages:
    2,395
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    55
    It out performs it, but is that because of changes that have allowed the 1.6 to perform like the 2.13 or is that because of the dual core?
     
  5. SRD

    SRD Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    133
    Messages:
    2,089
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Its just a more efficient design and because of the dual core. and in a sytem like the V6J its a benifit because lower heat and better battery life.
     
  6. CalebSchmerge

    CalebSchmerge Woof NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    1,126
    Messages:
    2,395
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I currently have a 1.5 Ghz PM Banias (sp?) How do you think the 1.66 in the W3j would compare? After several revisions and the dual core, will it be an out of this world difference, or will it just be a little quicker?
     
  7. PROPortable

    PROPortable Company Representative

    Reputations:
    418
    Messages:
    8,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Are you maxing that 1.5ghz out now? I'm going to venture to say you're not... Personally, after seeing the differences and doing my own testing... unless you've already gotten to a point and have software that will use it... you won't see much of a difference in real life..... you may think you do.. but a lot of it might just be mental... don't jump on it just because of the cpu.
     
  8. Chiqui

    Chiqui Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    but are these laptops going to have faster processors?
     
  9. SRD

    SRD Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    133
    Messages:
    2,089
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    its a hard thing to say. most the time our laptops are running at 800mhz to save power. So u wont notice then. but if you are running the pc full speed and using heaving photo shop and encoding different things. yes the 1.6 will blow your 1.5 out of the water. But just using out laptops for every day things you wont notice much. but the 1.66 will run much better than a single core 1.8
     
  10. ray50000

    ray50000 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    3
    Messages:
    312
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Super pi is a single threaded benchmark so it only takes advantage of one core. But even with just 1 core the 2.0 ghz core duos are getting around 1 min 16 secs while the old 2.0 ghz Pent M's would get around ~1 min 30 secs so there is definitely a speed increase. I really don't think that the processor is going to be the bottleneck in any system bought today; they are just too fast right now and other things like RAM and the hard drive need to catch up.
     
  11. Chiqui

    Chiqui Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I'm intersted on gaming basically and heavy design programs, so I would really want a faster core duo like most new notebooks offer, the 2.00Ghz, otherwise a single core 780m processor could beat the 1.66Ghz core duo, so there would't be a real advantage besides multy tasking.
     
  12. A-Lit

    A-Lit Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    3
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I'm looking at the W3J with similar questions in mind. I like the inclusion of the X1600 video card, and know that some games can be more processor-intensive - will the 2.0 Duo trounce the 1.66, or will there be modest gains that won't truly affect performance?