The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    w7J build quality

    Discussion in 'Asus' started by haydini, Nov 12, 2006.

  1. haydini

    haydini Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    14
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    A dumb question....

    is the W7J made with the same build quality and materials of construction as the W3J?

    Thanks
     
  2. MilestonePC.com

    MilestonePC.com Company Representative

    Reputations:
    160
    Messages:
    1,973
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    The build quality is very good on the W7J, it is close to the W3J in terms of quality.

    Here's a review on the W7J, also stating how good the build quality is.
    http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=3069&review=Asus+W7J

    PS: If you google "W7J build quality" for the first 3 pages you can see everyone is amazed at the build quality of the W7J.
     
  3. Geared2play.com

    Geared2play.com Company Representative

    Reputations:
    691
    Messages:
    4,770
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    It is a very mid range model from asus. You can not compare it to the w3j. For what it has in it, w7j could have been thinner. As for reliability...it is right up there with the w3j. w3 been around for almpst 2 years and is know for its durability while w7 has been around for about half year and thus far a popular seller and no major complaints. Some people dont like te dvdrw but the fact is the dvdrw works as it should
     
  4. PROPortable

    PROPortable Company Representative

    Reputations:
    418
    Messages:
    8,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Actually, the W7 couldn't have been thinner...... there gets to a point where there is a certain amount of stuff that needs to be shoved into the chasiss and if you make the footprint smaller, you may even have to make the thickness - thicker....... the S6 is the same thickness as the W7... which is the same as the W5 and W3........ Yes, the V6 is thinner, but with a 15" footprint, it has room to take everything that's in the W7 and spread it out over the footprint a little more.

    Some people don't like notebook optical drives period.... the super slim drives (as in the W7/ W5 / V6 / M5) have also been more finicky.... compare that to girls or whatever and you'll know what I mean... You get the benefits of a lighter and thinner drive... but need to deal with less compatibility and maybe a little more noise when burning....... but most people pick one brand of media and stick with them and how many people really burn on a laptop that is super portable? If you like to burn while you're on the subway - more power to you, but it's a difficult task for anyone, but may cause more of an issue with a drive like on the W7....

    The notebook is great though.