The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Samsung vs Seagate 250GB 7200RPM Benchmark

    Discussion in 'Dell XPS and Studio XPS' started by Forte, Jun 7, 2008.

  1. Forte

    Forte NBR's Supreme Angel

    Reputations:
    352
    Messages:
    2,462
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Just to get a comparison of the 250GB 7200RPM available for the M1530 right now and to get an idea of the differences between the two, here are the two benchmark tests for your comparison and review. Credit goes to Mattocs for the Seagate, whereas I tested the Samsung.

    Samsung 250GB 7200RPM
    (For some reason when saving the image access time and burst rate didn't show up in the saved file, but the results are: Access Time - 19.0ms Burst Rate 73.5 MB/sec)
    [​IMG]

    Seagate Momentus 250GB 7200RPM
    [​IMG]

    In case any of you were wondering whether Samsung or Seagate was better, or if your Samsung drive is better than the other Seagates vice versa, here you go!

    As one can see, clearly the 250GB Seagate as a slightly better Minimum Transfer rate and much better maximum transfer rate and the difference between the performance is a little over 2.7MB/sec. Access time is also much shorter by a good 2.4 seconds.

    The Samsung is better in its burst rate by 19.7MB/sec as well as having a smaller CPU usage by 1.3 percent.

    However, both drives are quiet and do not experience any heat problems with temperatures at 39 for the Samsung and 38 for the Seagate. Seagate wins by a 1 degree difference, no big deal.

    Overall there are a few tradeoffs:

    Min Transfer Rate: Samsung Wins
    Max Transfer Rate: Seagate
    Avg Transfer Rate: Samsung
    Burst: Samsung
    Access Time: Seagate
    CPU Usage: Samsung
    Temperature: Samsung (Minimal)
    Minimal Degredation: Samsung
     
  2. John Ratsey

    John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,197
    Messages:
    28,842
    Likes Received:
    2,172
    Trophy Points:
    581
    There were too many other processes trying to access the HDD when you tested the Samsung.

    Try again after making sure that indexing is turned off and SuperFetch has settled down. This will remove most of the downward spikes. However, I suspect the Seagate will still be ahead on performance. How do they compare for power consumption and heat?

    John
     
  3. Forte

    Forte NBR's Supreme Angel

    Reputations:
    352
    Messages:
    2,462
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Alright, I've reperformed the tests and have updated the Samsung above. For the sake of consistency, indexing and is left on to be accurate. Temperatures are about the same as the Samsung is 1 degree hotter than the Seagate, minimal difference.
     
  4. bubbatex

    bubbatex Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    64
    Messages:
    726
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Forte - my Seagate 160/5400rpm makes that constant "click-click" sound when it is not highly active - I had to use a hdparm script to keep it quiet. Does this Seagate do the same (seems that most of the people who had this problem had the exact drive I have from Seagate). I like the results - and your temps are about 4 degrees cooler than mine is currently.
     
  5. Forte

    Forte NBR's Supreme Angel

    Reputations:
    352
    Messages:
    2,462
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Click click sound is not normal. No it does do the same. It is also very cool on the wristpad. Usually click click sounds are caused by impact of the hard drive... I recommend you swap or find a way to get a new one.
     
  6. swiego

    swiego Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    12
    Messages:
    221
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Something's strange - what is the bottleneck on the Samsung over the first half of the platter? There is no decay seen with virtually every other magnetic disk made in the last 20 years.