The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Undervolting under Ubuntu 9.10?

    Discussion in 'Dell XPS and Studio XPS' started by Cytochromec, Nov 20, 2009.

  1. Cytochromec

    Cytochromec Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    So I recently installed Ubuntu 9.10 64bit on my M1530 and have a dual boot setup with the other OS being the NSA's Windows 7 64bit. This is my first Linux experience and I am rightfully enjoying it. Thus far I have been able to figure things out OK, but I am a total Linux newbie and dont know of a way to undervolt. I havent figured out if its possible to run RMClock and I dont know of a Linux alternative. Most the stuff I find on google is years old and Im thinking there have been better solutions since then. Does anyone know how to undervolt using Ubuntu 9.10? Thanks.
     
  2. Student Driver

    Student Driver Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    6
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Honestly, your first step to really getting to know Linux would be to use VMware Workstation, Player, or VirtualBox and make a virtual machine to run it. That way, you can boot into Windows all the time, and then fire up your virtual machine(s) and play around. They also use basic hardware so you shouldn't have issues installing virtually any version of Linux, BSD, or Windows on it. Also, you still keep the benefits of using Windows and all the tweaks you're used to.

    Barring that, have you also looked into the Ubuntu forums? I used to hang out there years ago and go by there occasionally (I have server and desktop VMs in 9.10) to see what's up.
     
  3. m1n05_4

    m1n05_4 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    14
    Messages:
    223
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  4. Cytochromec

    Cytochromec Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Studentdriver - I dont like to run virtual machines because they open up security holes in your system. I already tired linux with the live cd and liked it enough to go full on dual boot. I had already searched those forums and got some out dated results. There doesnt seem to really be an easy way to do it now without modifying the kernal, which I dont want to do. Thanks.

    M1n05_4 - I had found that link, but its over a year old. I was hoping there was an easier way. However, that linux google search is pretty cool, thanks.
     
  5. yossell

    yossell Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    33
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    6
    This may not be relevant to you but...

    if your interest is to conserve battery power and keep the computer running cooler so that the fan kicks in less often, then I have found running the program Powertop made an outstanding difference. Without it, I was losing an hour of battery life compared to windows. With it, and running a minimal desktop environment, I can get it running cooler and longer than in windows.

    However, it is not an undervolting solution - I think it mainly works to ensure that your chip runs slower, so it's not equivalent and may not be suitable if your interest was keeping the computer cooler while stressed.

    Yossell
     
  6. Student Driver

    Student Driver Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    6
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Security holes? Well, I've been virtualizing for around 8 years or so now, and I haven't found any consistent ways to compromise the sandbox of any host application. But, if you believe that then that's fine.

    Most applications that need to interact with low-level BIOS calls are going to need serious kernel interaction. This will likely involve, at a minimum, compiling the application against your kernel and probably recompiling your current kernel to allow for the hooks.