what does MSN usually broadcast @ on the webcam? Will it make a big difference in quality since the setup w/ the LED backlighting is only available w/ a .3 mp camera?
-
VGA is more than enough imo. The resolution of the .3mp camera is 640x480 which is more than the typical MSN-webcam window..
-
Yeah, it's unfortunate they couldn't stuff the 2MP camera into the LED version, but seriously, how often do you need to take high-resolution pictures of yourself?
Besides, we barely have enough power and bandwidth to encode and stream a true 640x480 video feed, let alone 2MP. -
Yes, 640x480 is more than enough for typical video chatting. Dont worry about the 2MP camera on the standard LCD. Cos you really cant stream at that resolution anyways. Even 1MP is too much.
-
A laptop is not a cam. VGA is fine. Don't forget that the native resolution of the screen is 1MP only! Even a WSGXA+ screen won't be enough for a 2MP image... And you would need a very decent bandwith to send this image + sound. Honestly, it's just marketing to promote a 2 or 3MP webcam on a laptop... The cheapest digital cam will produce better photos.
-
sesshomaru Suspended Disbelief!
I don't use MSN messenger,and don't video chat either, but it's my understanding that all of these, yahoo, msn included, stream at QVGA. Even the VGA is superfluous. Correct me if I am wrong.
-
I thought msn chats were 320 x 240 (qvga) as sesshomaru says.. but then again i dont use webcams.. Just go out if you want to talk to someone face to face
If it's for business use then I guess it may be handy..but any video conference i've ever been in was in a board room where you don't use your own cam.. -
XPS M1330 Camera... WTH
Discussion in 'Dell XPS and Studio XPS' started by leohsu825, Jul 10, 2007.