The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    1525 VS 1420, which one is smaller, lighter, and better looking?

    Discussion in 'Dell' started by omnisin, Jan 15, 2008.

  1. omnisin

    omnisin Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I know the 1420 is smaller but heard the 1525 is very sleek and "feels" smaller.
     
    omnisin, Jan 15, 2008
    #1
  2. Metamorphical

    Metamorphical Good computer user

    Reputations:
    2,618
    Messages:
    2,194
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    56
    I thnk the 1525 looks very nice myself. But the 1420 is smaller and can be outfitted with a high resolution screen. In truth the 1420 is lighter as well. I think the best way to deside this would be to take a trip to the local Dell kiosk or Bestbuy and check out some Dell notebooks in person.
     
    Metamorphical, Jan 15, 2008
    #2
  3. E30kid

    E30kid Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    38
    Messages:
    899
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    It feels smaller most likely because of the lack of a dedicated graphics card option. You can't magically stuff a 128MB video card into a 14" laptop without a little bulk. You could say that the 1330 is an exception to that but it costs a lot more. It could be sleeker because of the new glossy lid with graphics on it.
     
    E30kid, Jan 15, 2008
    #3
  4. XPS1330

    XPS1330 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    81
    Messages:
    967
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    the 1525 is smaller, lighter, and better looking. If you won't be playing any modern games, the 1525 is the better choice. Besides, the 8400M GS can't handle games made in 2007 anyways.
     
    XPS1330, Jan 15, 2008
    #4
  5. omnisin

    omnisin Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    haha true, the 8400 is almost pointless since it can't handle much anyways.
     
    omnisin, Jan 15, 2008
    #5
  6. PhoenixFx

    PhoenixFx Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    744
    Messages:
    3,083
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    True, it cant handle games like Crysis, but there are so many other not so gfx intensive games out there, that would run perfectly on 8400, like RTS and even role playing games. It is not on par with 8600 series or anything, but much better than a X3100. Not to mention the advantages of 2D graphics when driving high resolution external monitors or viewing HD content. What I'm trying to say its not always about running Crysis or Bioshock at high resolutions with max details :rolleyes:
     
    PhoenixFx, Jan 15, 2008
    #6