The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    I have T7300 CPU running at 800Mhz , whereas my ram is running at 667Mhz ? a waste ?

    Discussion in 'Dell' started by invis, Sep 30, 2007.

  1. invis

    invis Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Currently , I am thinking abt Vostro 1400 , I think I could not use up to my Cpu capacity if my ram is running at 667Mhz , but 667mhz is the only choice that Dell offers
     
  2. mfmbcpman

    mfmbcpman Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    59
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Refer to this thread.

    Also, when asking questions try to write a bit more coherently.
     
  3. knightingmagic

    knightingmagic Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    144
    Messages:
    1,194
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Wait for 800MHz FSB CPUs then. It'll be a long wait though.
     
  4. frazell

    frazell Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    81
    Messages:
    895
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    He's talking about Front Side Bus speeds...

    I don't think the RAM performance is a huge bottle neck in Dual Channel mode since the machine's FSB is Quad Pumped (200Mhz X 4)...
     
  5. portable pest

    portable pest Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    2
    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    by 800 MHz he meant the FSB speed. one of my friends told me that ur FSB and ram speed should match in order to max out the performance. though not too sure on this one..
     
  6. frazell

    frazell Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    81
    Messages:
    895
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    That is the classic way of thinking from when RAM and FSB buses were both single data rate... I'm not sure how applicable that is to now where FSBs are Quad Pumped (intel) and ram is DDR...
     
  7. manzi

    manzi Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    35
    Messages:
    598
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I think that the current Core 2 Duo processors make any Ram that is 800MHz down to 667MHz by default. So theres no point in getting 800 MHz ram, its a complete waste of money.
     
  8. kgeier82

    kgeier82 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    129
    Messages:
    757
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    more or less a waste, unless your gearing up for the future when 800mhz is the standard. That said, the price difference now is probably more than the price of 800mhz when its a common-place standard.
     
  9. TuxDude

    TuxDude Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    255
    Messages:
    921
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Actually while going for the FSB : DRAM ratio one should not look at the effective speeds but the actual ones.... A 800 Mhz FSB processor's true FSB is only 200 Mhz but is quad pumped.... Similarly a 667 Mhz DDR2 SDRAM's true memory clock is 333 Mhz..... So the FSB : DRAM ratio for this combination is 200:333 which is nothing but 3:5.... As you can clearly see it is not the RAM which is the bottleneck here to achieve a 1:1 FSB : DRAM ratio but the processor's FSB.... So the only way to achieve a true 1:1 ratio is by lowering the memory clock..... With a 667 Mhz DDR2 SDRAM more memory cycles would be wasted thats all....

    With the AMD processors it is a totally different case since the memory controller is integrated onto the processor itself and have a Hypertransport bus between the CPU and RAM.....

    And to clarify one more thing Santa Rosa platform with 965GM or 965PM chipset does not support RAM clocks higher than 667 Mhz and so there is no use buying a 800 Mhz DDR2 SDRAM....
     
  10. invis

    invis Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    What a great post , are you an engineer ?
     
  11. TuxDude

    TuxDude Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    255
    Messages:
    921
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Lol yeah :D But what I posted is out of my general knowledge and nearly more than 10 years experience with computer hardware and the technical stuff....