Did I make the right choice to not upgrade the processor to 2.16 ghz? I kept it at 2.0 because I thought the increase will make no difference. I got the better configuration from the dell website by the way.
-
in terms of FSB they are exactly the same 667mhz. So the difference isn't gigantic. ^^ There are a lot of different things that make your computer faster, not only the processor. ^^ Also depends what you are going to use the laptop for. ^^ For everyday college use, it should be great.
-
Okay, I just want to know would the difference been worth upgrading for between the two?
-
What do you using the laptop for? Unless you are into hardcore gaming, it will be PERFECTLY fine.
-
Nope, no hardcore gaming... I'm a casual gamer. This laptop was for college mostly.
-
really, I wanted to know how big the difference is performance wise btween the 2.0 ghz dual core and 2.16 ghz dual core.
-
could anyone tell me the difference?
-
It would be a few percent at the very most.
-
-
I made the same decision. In the UK the upgrade was £30 ($55) so I didn't think a 0.16Ghz upgrade was worth that. Instead I put in another gigabyte of RAM, and I'm sure that'll yield a bigger performance upgrade than the 0.16Ghz would have.
-
You will not notice a difference unless your a stats freak.
-
Cool, thanks for clearing that up. I'm glad I made the right decision.
I just got my studio laptop and just wanted one thing answered...
Discussion in 'Dell' started by musashi8, Aug 23, 2008.