I'm looking to pull the trigger on the new 17R 7720 and I've been lurking here for about a month.
I know it currently supports Sata II, but I'm curious if there's any chance that a software update from dell would provide support for Sata III?
what are the odds?
matchbx
-
Tsunade_Hime such bacon. wow
Why wouldn't it have native SATA 3 support? All Sandy Bridge laptops support SATA 3, Ivy Bridge laptops should too.
-
-
When I started researching the SE a few weeks ago, I could have sworn I saw it spec'd out with SATA II. I guess I could could have gotten confused amongst the sea of browser tabs open at the time.
good to know.
Thanks,
matchbx -
-
Sorry for any confusion, but I was't talking about the msata port. I was under the impression the regular drives were sata II. This made no sense to me, but neither does only including 10/100 network port and not 10/100/1000.
matchbx
Sent from my AT100 using Tapatalk 2 -
Tsunade_Hime such bacon. wow
-
I am using gigabit network at home, for all my desktop/servers, but all laptops, barely EVER used the wired ethernet card, mostly for config of one remote router but that's it... 99% of the time, my laptops are using wireless network, so i don't really see the point of a 10/100/1000 port here on the laptop... I did replace the internal wireless card with a Bigfoot Killer network card, as i need reliable network especially on gaming, and imho, this can only be reached with a Bigfoot Killer network card.
-
Second it used to bother me about why didn't Dell include a 10/100/1000 Ethernet port instead of a 10/100 Ethernet port and they said that the motherboards they buy for the laptop come in kits and the kit contained a 10/100 Ethernet port only. Also do you understand that a Gigabit port is useless since most cable, DSL, FIOS companies offer only 10, 20, or 30 Mbps connection. Unless your home ISP is topping well past 100 Mbps, a Gigabit port is completely useless. To me the lack of a gigabit port is not a deal breaker for me since I use wireless most of the time anyways. -
Now 10 Gigabit Ethernet is hardly commonplace but (1)Gigabit Ethernet has been around since I think 1999 and has transfer rates of...you guessed it! So transferring between two computers or to a server with Gigabit controllers and a straight Cat 5e or better cable will give you 1Gbit/s transfer speeds.
Now compare that to the Bigfoot Killer Network Wireless-N 1102 that Rassal mentioned which has a transfer rate of something like 300Mb/s and you can see the difference.
All that being said, for me it's not the end of the world as I most likely won't be using it for this purpose. But I can see how it would be a deal breaker for others -
I am assuming everyone on this board is planning to use the laptops for home personal use. I didn't mean to apply my statements to all situations.
I mean the same principle applies to Wireless G and wireless N. Most home ISPs don't even offer speeds to max out wireless G speeds (54 Mbps) so I find it funny when people freak out like wireless G is phased out and that they need to jump to wireless N and buy a new router/network card. Wireless G is suitable for most folks since the speeds aren't topped yet. However the reason to jump to wireless N is the range improvements, improvements in max speeds (300 Mbps) and use of MIMO. -
Yea, I really wouldn't have a lot of use for a gigabit port, I only mentioned it as an example of cost cutting measures dell used. I was under the impression they did the same thing with Sata.
-
Belkin-USB-Gigabit-Ethernet-Adapter
Inspiron 17R SE Sata III Support?
Discussion in 'Dell' started by matchbx, Aug 8, 2012.