The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Pentium M 2.26 Vs Core Duo .66Ghz

    Discussion in 'Dell' started by sonyfxa36, May 28, 2006.

  1. sonyfxa36

    sonyfxa36 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    190
    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    31
    i was windering about something i have a dell latitude d810 running on a intel pentium m 2.26 and a friend of mine has a dell e1505 running at 1.66ghz core duo which is better or faster?
     
  2. yamla

    yamla Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    252
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Looking ONLY at the CPU, the Pentium-M will be a fair amount faster for single-threaded tasks while the Core Duo will be substantially faster for multithreaded tasks.

    Most of what you do these days with computers is essentially just single-threaded. That said, dual-core CPUs seem 'snappier' as many small operating system tasks can run on the second CPU. There are some tasks, though, where the second core will really come in to play. I do a lot of compiling in Linux, for example, and a second core nets me almost a 100% speedup.
     
  3. Jason

    Jason Overclocker NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    908
    Messages:
    5,056
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    206
    You should run super pi on both systems and compare your results.
     
  4. ZaZ

    ZaZ Super Model Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    4,982
    Messages:
    34,001
    Likes Received:
    1,415
    Trophy Points:
    581
    CPU is only part of a notebooks overall performance equation.
     
  5. drumfu

    drumfu super modfu

    Reputations:
    436
    Messages:
    3,651
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    to add to what ZaZ said, the CPU is a actually small part of the overall performance.

    try this: enable task manager or run some type of monitoring software like samurize or rm clock or something. then go about your normal computing. take note of how often you actually get the cpu up to 100% AND how long it stays there. you will notice that even if you get your cpu up to 100% in normal computing, it never stays there for more than a second or so.

    the only time the cpu will give you a noticeable improvement is when you are performing a cpu intensive task; for example, virus scanning or rendering a video file for 100 hours. this would max your cpu out for 100 hours. if you have a cpu that is 25% faster, then you can reduce your 100 hour render time by 25%; i.e, it's now 75 hours.

    however, when you only peg your cpu for a half second or 1 second, there is no speed advantage (technically, there is but it's so infinitesimal that a human user will not notice the difference).
     
  6. Leo_s84

    Leo_s84 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    12
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Is super pi multi-threaded? Cause if it's not the 1.6 core duo kills the 2.26 pentium M in every aspect (Single and multithreaded programs)
     
  7. sonyfxa36

    sonyfxa36 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    190
    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    31
    wow now i feel shameful about my Pentium M =)
     
  8. lilredfoxie

    lilredfoxie Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    51
    Messages:
    381
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    yea but somehow ur video card still beats mine on CPU-Z, tho i beat ya in everything else *giggles*