The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    RAM Advice

    Discussion in 'Dell' started by Matt is Pro, Sep 7, 2007.

  1. Matt is Pro

    Matt is Pro I'm a PC, so?

    Reputations:
    347
    Messages:
    2,169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
  2. frazell

    frazell Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    81
    Messages:
    895
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    If i rem. the CAS Latency is the time in nano seconds it takes the RAM to locate a specific address or something like that... So in general, as you said, the lower the better...

    I would personally choose 4 over 5, but it depends what you will be doing since you might not really notice the difference ;)...
     
  3. powerpack

    powerpack Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    7,101
    Messages:
    5,757
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I am not going to explain other than simple terms because that is all I can do. If it takes 4 cycles to get to the needed info vs 5 cycles the diff is, CL5 is 25% more than CL4. So you have 667 cycles/s if that was all that mattered (not that simple but best I can do) the CL5 would be 25% slower retrieving info.

    To give an example 667Mhz is 25% faster than 533Mhz but 677Mhz CL5 and 533Mhz CL4 have about the same actual bandwidth because the faster speed is offset by the delay in getting the requested info. Both you are looking at are good but the CL4 will be about 20% faster (actual bandwidth), I think it is worth it.
     
  4. Matt is Pro

    Matt is Pro I'm a PC, so?

    Reputations:
    347
    Messages:
    2,169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I'm a hardcore user, so I'll probably go with 4, but I wanted to be sure that it'd be worth the extra cash.
     
  5. AlCabone

    AlCabone Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    2
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    The core 2 duo processors aren't memory latency dependent, so the difference between CL4 and CL5 won't be much,maybe not even noticeable.
     
  6. Matt is Pro

    Matt is Pro I'm a PC, so?

    Reputations:
    347
    Messages:
    2,169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Either way, I want to match the FSB of the processor with the clock speed of the RAM. (both at 667MHz)

    Thanks for the help guys!
     
  7. biohzrd

    biohzrd Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    3
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    In the case of the new Santa Rosa chipsets, the FSB of the memory has a max of 667MHz, while the FSB of the CPU is 800MHz. If you purchase 800MHz RAM, it will be a waste of money.
     
  8. Mimino

    Mimino Notebook Communist

    Reputations:
    1,181
    Messages:
    1,474
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    biohzrd, amen