Hi guys, I'm thinking of getting a 1520 with the non glossy 1200x800 option. What I am wondering though is how much you can see vertically on a 1200x800 sceen? To give you background, I currently have been using a 14.1" standard screen on my current notebook which I've had for 6 years now. For me it has the perfect amount of vertical viewing space at 1024x768. At that res it fits 9 icons vertically. I am curious as to how many icons that a 1200x800 screen can display vertically as that would give me an idea of how much vertical real estate I would be gaining/losing.
I'll admit I don't know as much about the technical details of the resolution settings as I should. I know the widescreen gives you more horizontal screen viewing because 1200 > 1024. Does that logic also mean though that I'll get more (albeit a fraction more) vertical viewing from a widescreen because 800 > 768?
I'd appreciate any input on this because I'm a bit out of the widescreen loop.
Thanks in advance for any answers to my questions anyone is able to provide.
-
With my 15 inch screen and 1024 x 768 resolution and XP, it fits 9 icons.
With Vista 15.4, it fits 7 icons, but I feel like the icons are wider apart from each other. -
Go for the 1400x900. Trust me. I just got mine and it looks AMAZING. Just be good and wait the extra 5 days for it. It's WELL worth it. And in the future you may regret it as you can't upgrade that...or at least not cheap, voiding the warranty and difficult.
-
Personally, I recommend the WSXGA+ because I enjoy having much more desktop space, but I don't know how you would handle the 91 DPI to 129 DPI increase. -
10 icons down and 17 across on my e1505 1280 x 800 res.
EDIT: On windows XP -
Hey thanks for all the replies guys! That was exactly the kind of information I was looking for. I had wondered if Vista had wider spacing or larger icons because when I looked at one with a 1280x800 display running vista I only counted 7 icons going vertically so I thought I would be losing vertical space. As for the OS I will most likely put WinXP on the machine.
To ps2cho, I actually am really tempted on the 1400x900 as it does sound like a good mid ground between wxga and wuxga but the only thing I'm hesitant of is the fact that I can not get that in the non-glossy alternative. Both my current laptop and my new 19" lcd samsung monitor for my desktop are the matte finish kind and I have gotten very used to that. I wish the whole industry wouldn't have just switched over like crazy to this glossy stuff. It didn't even seem like it was a gradual shift, basically everyone decided to just go glossy with whatever their next product was going to be and never look back.
I will take all your input and suggestions with me as I contemplate my purchase. Thanks a lot guys.
Thinking about a 1520 with 1200x800 res, but have a res question.
Discussion in 'Dell' started by kruege311, Jul 14, 2007.