The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Why did this Studio 15 do better than mine?

    Discussion in 'Dell' started by lottdod_1999, Jun 29, 2009.

  1. lottdod_1999

    lottdod_1999 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    89
    Messages:
    698
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  2. Manofest

    Manofest Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    30
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    By how much do the differ? Benchmark scores can vary on each run.
     
  3. lottdod_1999

    lottdod_1999 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    89
    Messages:
    698
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    well Pcmark06 is actually better on theirs :/
     
  4. Diddyman

    Diddyman Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Also if you are looking at 3dMark 2006 they are not running it at default res of 1280x1024

    "All of the 3DMark06 scores for all of the systems listed above were run at 1280 x 800 resolution. However, due to the 16:9 screen ratio on the Studio 15 (1555) we benchmarked the notebook at 1280x768 ... which was the closest resolution available in 3DMark06 for use with the built-in screen."
     
  5. lottdod_1999

    lottdod_1999 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    89
    Messages:
    698
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I used whatever the default was for the trial for 3dmark06
    i think it was lower like the x768 one