The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    dell latitude x1

    Discussion in 'Dell' started by car3756, Jul 12, 2005.

  1. car3756

    car3756 Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    isnt the 1.1Ghz somewhat of a disappointment for its price?
     
  2. Andrew Baxter

    Andrew Baxter -

    Reputations:
    4,365
    Messages:
    9,029
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    216
    you're not paying so much for the processor as the fact it costs more to manufacturer smaller specialty parts so everything fits in a smaller package that is the X1.
     
  3. Brian

    Brian Working at 486 Speed NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    947
    Messages:
    8,970
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    I am surprised though that they're not offering the 1.2 yet. They should soon, so that will be a small benefit. As for the price, as noted, you're paying for more than the CPU.
     
  4. ivar

    ivar Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    432
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Is it in principle possible to overclock this 1.1 GHz ULV processor, at least for short time (to avoid overheating) when one really needs a good arythmetic performance to do some application?

    What is actually the difference between ULV PMs and usual PMs? In fact, using the rmclock program I managed to undervolt my 2GHz processor to 1.148V at 2GHz.
    1.6GHz PMs can be undervolted back to the specs of ULVs while still operating at 1.6GHz.

    I made an experiment and limited the clock of my 2GHz Pentium 755 to 1.1 GHz.
    After undervolting it was running prime95 stable with only 0.780 V (0.796 without fan) at 1.1GHz and 0.7V at 600MHz. Super pi 2M calculation was running 2min 50 sec, i.e. the same as X1. When I forcefully turned the fan off when running prime95 at 1.1GHz, the CPU temperature has reached 72°C and stabilised then (it was around 20°C in the room).
    It is similar to the behavior of 1.1GHz ULV processor?

    So, are the ULV processors just undervolted (specially selected deeply undervoltable) and underclocked PMs? What is the point of underclocking them then?

    Do ULV processors have better temperature range to work without fans? Are thy technologically superior in some sense?

    Does the speedstep technology work for ULV processors? What are the clock steps for 1.1GHz ULV processor in Dell X1?

    Can I use the rmclock program with this processor to undervolt it even deeper in order to produce even less heat? Did someone try it?

    Somehow I found it difficult to find answers to these questions on the web.

    Last question: what is the chassis of dell x1 made of? Is it proper for the passive cooling?
     
  5. queshy

    queshy Notebook Deity NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    203
    Messages:
    938
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I hear of a lot of people getting by with the 1.1 - it's not as slow as it sounds.