The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    m1530 667mhz memory? Would 800mhz be better?

    Discussion in 'Dell' started by sethhobrin, Dec 28, 2007.

  1. sethhobrin

    sethhobrin Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    153
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Would it make any sense to upgrade the memory on a 1530 to 800mhz memory? Would it be faster?
     
  2. Zahn1138

    Zahn1138 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    18
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    No. The Santa Rosa chipset doesn't support DDR2-800.
     
  3. Greg

    Greg Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    7,857
    Messages:
    16,212
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    466
    533 and 667 memory performs roughly the same, and even if 800 was supported you would not see any performance improvements really. Just a bit of info for you :rolleyes:
     
  4. sethhobrin

    sethhobrin Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    153
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Thanks for the quick responses. Consider this thread answered!
     
  5. outkastland

    outkastland Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    34
    Messages:
    461
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    agreed for sure
     
  6. Matt is Pro

    Matt is Pro I'm a PC, so?

    Reputations:
    347
    Messages:
    2,169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I believe Montevina is going to move from DDR2-667 RAM to DDR3-800 RAM.

    Correct me if I'm wrong.
     
  7. Zahn1138

    Zahn1138 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    18
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Wikipedia agrees with you, Matt.
     
  8. outkastland

    outkastland Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    34
    Messages:
    461
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Yes wikipedia does for sure. heh......heh......
     
  9. Matt is Pro

    Matt is Pro I'm a PC, so?

    Reputations:
    347
    Messages:
    2,169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Haha.

    Thanks....I guess?
     
  10. Zahn1138

    Zahn1138 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    18
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    The problem is that I actually edited that in just so it would agree with you. ;)
     
  11. Matt is Pro

    Matt is Pro I'm a PC, so?

    Reputations:
    347
    Messages:
    2,169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I'm going to have to say you didn't.

    I've seen that info there before. :)
     
  12. sahaskatta

    sahaskatta Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    31
    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    i think even the penryn which is being announced on january 7th by Intel's CEO at CES will support the 800MHz RAM.
     
  13. outkastland

    outkastland Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    34
    Messages:
    461
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Yes the Penny will.
     
  14. tgjohnson

    tgjohnson Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Wouldn't DDR2 800 run at a lower latency then DDR2 667, when downclocked?
     
  15. flaxx

    flaxx Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    95
    Messages:
    518
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    exactly. ddr2 667 runs at CL 5... ddr2 800 also runs at cl 5, but on my m1530, since it only runs at 667 :( it runs at cl 4. so i have faster timings which is nice.
     
  16. VinylPusher

    VinylPusher Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    6
    Messages:
    141
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    RAM latency isn't so much of an issue, these days. CPU's have such good prediction technology, large caches and interleaved / dual-channel memory access that it virtually eliminates any benefits of low latency RAM.

    I've got some old 2-2-2-5 DDR1 in my desktop machine and it made no difference to real-world performance. Only a couple of synthetic tests showed a difference (and then less than 2%). It's probably no coincidence that you can't buy extreme low-latency RAM these days (at least, not from most of the popular outlets).