The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Low performance with i3 6100

    Discussion in 'Desktop Hardware' started by tiner, Apr 2, 2018.

  1. tiner

    tiner Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    101
    Messages:
    435
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Hi everybody

    I'm just benchmarking my i3 for the first time and I'm getting low scores compared to other published results.

    450 xtu marks instead of normal 650, 4500 3dmark physics instead of common 6500.

    Besides, noticed lower performance while gaming because of bottlenecking of the cpu.

    Checked cpu usage and clocks while gaming and everything seems correct, clocked at 3.7 ghz with about 100% cpu usage while benchmarking and getting low results, I don't understand at all.

    What could I check in order to get that 30% extra performance back?



    Enviado desde mi SM-G950F mediante Tapatalk
     
  2. Charles P. Jefferies

    Charles P. Jefferies Lead Moderator Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    22,339
    Messages:
    36,639
    Likes Received:
    5,080
    Trophy Points:
    931
    It could be thermal throttle.

    Run HWMonitor while you run your benchmarks. Check it to see what your CPU temperatures are at.

    Charles
     
    KY_BULLET likes this.
  3. tiner

    tiner Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    101
    Messages:
    435
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Nope.

    65 degrees at most in full performance benchmark....

    I think it must be some kind of software or bios issue but I don’t have any clue about what could it exactly be as it has proper clocks and proper usage percent.


    Enviado desde mi iPad utilizando Tapatalk
     
  4. KY_BULLET

    KY_BULLET Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    802
    Messages:
    655
    Likes Received:
    794
    Trophy Points:
    106
    What Ram are you running (Brand,Mhz,Gb)?
     
  5. tiner

    tiner Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    101
    Messages:
    435
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I'll check it.

    But I think it is only one 8 gb stick running at 1066 mhz or so.

    I haven't dual channel.

    Enviado desde mi SM-G950F mediante Tapatalk
     
  6. KY_BULLET

    KY_BULLET Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    802
    Messages:
    655
    Likes Received:
    794
    Trophy Points:
    106
    From the Intel page on your CPU. Looks like you can run higher frequencies and DDR4. Might need to check with your Motherboard manufacturer to be sure it can handle DDR4. Not sure if motherboards or CPU determines whether or not you can run it.

    It's possible that your Ram is bottle necking your CPU which in turn is bottle necking your GPU.

    I'm not too familiar with Ram but I know when I went from 16gb to 32gb (2600mhz-3400mhz), I got around 6-800 points higher on fire strike.
     
  7. tiner

    tiner Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    101
    Messages:
    435
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Hi!

    I have checked both motherboard and the ram module.

    I have an Asus H110M and a DDR4 1066 8GB KINGSTON PC4 17000 STICK.

    Does it worth upgrading it for gaming performance improvement?

    Thank you.


    Enviado desde mi SM-G950F mediante Tapatalk
     
  8. KY_BULLET

    KY_BULLET Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    802
    Messages:
    655
    Likes Received:
    794
    Trophy Points:
    106
    I would at least buy the best it can handle since you're trying to game on it. That being a 8gb 2133mhz stick or 2 if possible.

    Even buying another 8gb 1066mhz like you already have would make it run better (I think) as long as it's exaclty the same as the one you have (Mhz,brand,voltage needed etc etc...).

    I have 2 8gb 2400mhz kingston ram that was used for one month but I don't know if that would work for you or not. Depends on your CPU rather than motherboard, I'm pretty sure.
     
    Last edited: Apr 6, 2018
    Convel, tiner and Mr. Fox like this.
  9. Mr. Fox

    Mr. Fox BGA Filth-Hating Elitist

    Reputations:
    37,235
    Messages:
    39,339
    Likes Received:
    70,655
    Trophy Points:
    931
    That's most likely the problem in a nutshell. Single channel is much slower than dual channel and XTU loves fast memory. I would buy a matching stick and upgrade to 16GB dual channel. It will make your system snappier at lots of things.

    This is perfect advice. If you cannot afford a new kit as suggested, at least get one that matches what you already have.

    The board supports XMP, so it should be able to handle 2400 or higher with no sweat.

    https://www.asus.com/us/Motherboards/H110M-A/specifications/
     
    Convel, tiner and KY_BULLET like this.
  10. tiner

    tiner Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    101
    Messages:
    435
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Hi.

    Updates!

    I have installed this ram module, which is supposed to run at 2133 mhz. Am I right?

    But it appears to be running only at 1066!

    Why? [​IMG]

    Enviado desde mi SM-G950F mediante Tapatalk
     
  11. Support.2@XOTIC PC

    Support.2@XOTIC PC Company Representative

    Reputations:
    486
    Messages:
    3,148
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Trophy Points:
    331
    That RAM is intended to run as dual channel, so a single module running at half rated speed is what you see there. ( 2133/2=1066 )