The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Not asking for help, rather asking for thoughts...

    Discussion in 'Desktop Hardware' started by Thaenatos, Jul 13, 2016.

  1. Thaenatos

    Thaenatos Zero Cool

    Reputations:
    1,581
    Messages:
    5,346
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Been a strict dell and hp micro server user for many years and Im starting to consider building an Xotic mosnter desktop and running it instead. As it stands the price isnt much better but its still around 15-30% better. Our uses will be email, DC, file and IIS/app server roles. So nothing huge, and our current old but still semi relevant server still serves well with 2 quad core xeons, but Im thinking about going with a 10 core high end I7 this time around and save some $$$

    Any thoughts are welcome. Im still in the pricing research phase and before I bought a desktop over a server class I thought I was going mad. Any thoughts are welcome!
     
  2. Galm

    Galm "Stand By, We're Analyzing The Situation!"

    Reputations:
    1,228
    Messages:
    5,696
    Likes Received:
    2,949
    Trophy Points:
    331
    Any reason you want the 1700 dollar i7 instead of a cheaper 10 or 12 core xeon? Also this may be obvious but it'll cost less to build it yourself instead of using someone else to build it, unless you want support a lot.
     
    Jarhead and TomJGX like this.
  3. TomJGX

    TomJGX I HATE BGA!

    Reputations:
    1,456
    Messages:
    8,707
    Likes Received:
    3,315
    Trophy Points:
    431
    Agreed, the Xeon would be a better choice and much cheaper then the 6950X.. Honestly, the 6950X is waste of money...
     
  4. Jarhead

    Jarhead 恋の♡アカサタナ

    Reputations:
    5,036
    Messages:
    12,168
    Likes Received:
    3,134
    Trophy Points:
    681
    You can certainly build a server with desktop parts if you like (I just did, actually). And it's not unheard of for some companies to do that same (check out LinusTechTips on Youtube as an example).

    That said, I'd agree with the Xeon chips over the i7 chips.
     
  5. Thaenatos

    Thaenatos Zero Cool

    Reputations:
    1,581
    Messages:
    5,346
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    231
    I think I might be leaning more towards a server class for reliability after an incident this weekend with some consumer level hardware thats half the age of our domain controller thats still chugging along.

    Because I can build a system with it for alot less then a server class machine with older and lower end hardware. As for building it myself Id rather not for work as its a PITA to support separate warranties for hardware as opposed to having the entire machine being supported by a central vendor.

    I know for the average user that the 10 core i7 is a waste of money, but comparing the price to a xeon system thats comparable its cheaper.

    I really like Linus' server cases thats for sure. The main issue I have in using consumer hardware for a server task is it worries me about uptime and longevity.
     
  6. Galm

    Galm "Stand By, We're Analyzing The Situation!"

    Reputations:
    1,228
    Messages:
    5,696
    Likes Received:
    2,949
    Trophy Points:
    331
    Again for longevity why using a xeon makes more sense. Those chips are designed to run for years without powering down, i7s are not. The 10 core i7 is just not a smart buy. Its not much better than an 8 core i7 and you could practically buy 2 for the price of one 10 core.
     
    1nstance likes this.