Which is better? I read somewhere that that Titan X is not so great because sometimes the dual GPUs in it don't scale well? Then why is the price tag of a Titan Z double the Titan X?
Which is really better?
-
Spartan@HIDevolution Company Representative
-
Titan Z = 2 x Titan Black with downclock. Will require SLI to perform properly; being a single card does NOT excuse it from needing to use SLI. Recommend two actual Titan Blacks instead.
Titan X = Full maxwell card. DOES NOT CONTAIN DUAL-PRECISION RENDERING BLOCK. Cannot recommend purchase. 980Ti better bang for buck by $350.Spartan@HIDevolution likes this. -
Titan Z is a double precision CUDA compute card, not for gaming. It's two underclocked Titan Black GPUs on a single PCB. And since Titan cards never drop below $1000, it costs twice as much as the newer Maxwell-based Titan X.
Titan X is for single and half precision compute, but for gaming 980 Ti makes it irrelevant.
Also this belongs in the desktop hardware section.Spartan@HIDevolution and killkenny1 like this. -
Spartan@HIDevolution Company Representative
so you advice me for my next system due after the Skylake release to go with a Dual 980TI GTX rather than Dual Titan Xs?pathfindercod likes this. -
kent1146, killkenny1, D2 Ultima and 1 other person like this.
-
Spartan@HIDevolution Company Representative
-
Honestly I would not bother with AMD, I don't expect anything special out of their next GPU release. If you have the itch to get something now I would go with SLI 980TI. Gameworks as bad as it is for the industry is becoming standard in a lot of big name releases.
Spartan@HIDevolution likes this. -
dumitrumitu24 Notebook Evangelist
why bothering buying a top card from nvidia when in 2years it will be crippled
.Im sure that AMD is making big things.Bear in mind that AMD will profit mostly cause of new windows 10 and dx12
-
-
pathfindercod Notebook Virtuoso
People always say wait for the next card. if you wait then you'll never build a PC always waiting. Yes if you buy a top tier card it will be outdated 2 years from now, that's the way it goes and that's the way it's been since the home computer has been produced.although not as bad as in the late 80's early 90's. The last 12-15 years it has bee exponentially speeding up with newer technology every few months.
So I guess the point it is keep speculating and waiting for the next generation or buy what fits your needs now and start enjoying the computer.Spartan@HIDevolution likes this. -
killkenny1 Too weird to live, too rare to die.
.
-
killkenny1 Too weird to live, too rare to die.
.
-
killkenny1 Too weird to live, too rare to die.
...
-
My second titan x just shipped today, can't wait to benchmark these in SLI
HNGGGGGGGGGG... -
CptXabaras, LanceAvion, Spartan@HIDevolution and 3 others like this.
-
killkenny1 Too weird to live, too rare to die.
.
-
-
If you need the <CPU / GPU / laptop / etc> right now, then it is never worth waiting.
If you don't need the <CPU / GPU / laptop / etc> right now, then it is always worth waiting. -
-
I'd wait to see what gets released, especially around the 4GB of RAM. My guess is that 4GB is just the reference design. It's not uncommon for graphics card manufacturers to do modified designs that add more VRAM onto the card.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CES brought some light to the darkness though
-
-
I'm concerned about how much VRAM the Fiji FirePro would have. The can't have less VRAM than before can they? -
Last edited: Jun 14, 2015
Titan Z vs Titan X?
Discussion in 'Desktop Hardware' started by Spartan@HIDevolution, Jun 9, 2015.