The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Anyone have problems w/S6231 rejecting RAM?

    Discussion in 'Fujitsu' started by RaNDoMMAI, Jan 13, 2005.

  1. RaNDoMMAI

    RaNDoMMAI Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    i am looking to buy this corsair RAM for the fujitsu S6231
    http://www.newegg.com/app/viewproductdesc.asp?description=20-145-506&DEPA=0

    Or maybe even a kingston one from bestbuy.

    I was wondering if anyone had any problems with the notebook rejecting RAM? any brands i should advoid for sure?

    The Corsair RAM i have linked runs at PC3200, will it just drop to PC2700 on its own and run right?

    TIA
    ~RaNDoM
     
    RaNDoMMAI, Jan 13, 2005
    #1
  2. Brian

    Brian Working at 486 Speed NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    947
    Messages:
    8,970
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Any RAM should be fine. Yes, faster RAM will jsut slow down.

    Editor in Chief http://www.bargainPDA.com and http://www.SPOTstop.com
     
    Brian, Jan 13, 2005
    #2
  3. RaNDoMMAI

    RaNDoMMAI Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    thx Brian

    I ask because i have encounter some mobos that have been very picky in the pass. for example, i once had this really cheap PC chips athlon board and it didnt take Geil, PQI, or even corsair. i had to use kingston for it.

    but for the most part, i think corsair ram has work in ever single mobo i used expect that one

    ~RaNDoM
     
    RaNDoMMAI, Jan 13, 2005
    #3