3dMark05 Scores (Revised)

i think you can get higher the 128mb x700 can get 3000+ when oc

 

Man,

The 6800 Go is a beast...4573 Marks in 05 with specs in my sig. I just wish I could get a 7800 without modding my lappy.

 

can this be normal ?
Latitude D610 1GB ram PM 760 and ATI X300 64mb

and grand total of ........ 901 !!
fps fluctuated between 1 and 4 !! it was comical!

 

Sounds a little low, but you have the X300 64MB with Hypermemory right? That is alot slower than just dedicated memory on the video card. I think that would be about right for that.

 

as far as I'm aware its dedicated memory, any way I can tell for sure ? There was no mention of hypermemory when I bought it

cheers
gerryR

 

If it doesn't have hypermemory then that score is about right. The X300 isn't a great graphics card plus it would only have 64MB of memory. If there is not Hypermemory then that score would be about right.

 

thanks for the reply, do you (or anyone else) know how I can rell if my system uses hypermemory or not ? As I said when I purchased it there was no mention of it (there'd usually be an * that later explains that its not dedicated memory)

thanks
gerryR

 

On Dell's site it does not say that it it hypermemory. So I have come to the conclusion that it is not hypermemory and you only have 64MB of Video RAM for the video card.

 

The D610's X300 has 64MB of dedicated DDR memory.

Yeah . . unfortunately, 901 is what you should be getting for that card from what I have seen. Updating your video drivers to the latest (Mobility Catalyst 5.13) will help performance.

 

cheers mate, I'll do that and post my results.

edit
I installed the Omega drivers (based on calalyst 5.12 and got slightly less than before, 896 !) so now I just installed the latest ATI 5.13 and got 1003 !

Still crap but its not bad, 10% increase!
cheers
gerryR

 

Catalyst 5.12 (at least the Mobility version) was utter crap.

 

Yeah, it was. Terrible image quality. I never updated to them. The 5.11's were very good from my usage - stable, no problems. The 5.13's are a worthy upgrade to the 5.11's.

 

Terrible image quality? Haha. That is if you got them to work at all.

 

I've been using the latest Catalyst 6.1's for a few days. I saw a small (about 5 FPS) performance gain in Knights of the Old Republic, but everything else seems to be the same. They're pretty stable from what I'm seeing.

 

Using a ASUS Z81Sp with a P4(630H/T) 3GHz, 1GB DDR-2 RAM (dual channel config) and a 256MB GDDR3 6800 go.

3dmark05 score is 3830 with noverclocking and with stock drivers that came with my notebook

 

3767 with a bloody overclocked 6600GT.

 

6600gt in a laptop???

Anyhoo', concerning the x700 128mb, it all depends on which one you have. The ones in Z70Va's cannot go over 3000, unless maybe you have a cpu that's faster than my 2.0ghz. I don't know I haven't tried, who knows.

My baby won't go past 29xx. That's it's absolute max, which gives artifacts in other games, so I leave my baby at 378/371.

Hey Chaz, you think it's worthwhile to go from the 5.13's to the 6.1's?

I hear the Catalyst Control thingy is better in 6.1, is it?

Cheers,
Mike

 

3dmark05 7753, conservative o/c to 449Mhz and 1.19Ghz. Sager 9750 X2 4800+ and 78000GTX.

Won't even try to bench my Dell Inspiron 8200...

 

6600GT only comes in a desktop forum. No way a Go6600 is getting the score that dr. did.

Yeah, it's worth it to go from the 5.13's. 6.1's are stable and work well, not sure of any performance increases, but they do fix some little glitches in games I think.

Couldn't tell you about CCC, sorry, I don't have that installed. I just use the stock ATI driver + ATI Tray Tools.

 

Well, if someone put a Go6600 with 1.6ns GDDR3 and a good sample of the core that could overclock to and beyond 6600GT speeds...

But indeed, that was on my desktop.

 

I managed a 1717 with my Toshiba P-30 W/ATI 9700 with the Omega 3.8.205 drivers and a mild overclock. Before that i could only get 1300's with much more risky overclock.

 

I couldn't find a link to download the benchmarking software. Any help?
(probably going blind and stupid from catching up all the different threads:0)

 

http://www.futuremark.com/

here you can download the whole 3dmark series, hope you have high speed. 05 is 283 megs.

 

i just ran 3DMarks06 and got a score of 637. I am running a V4000t with 1.83ghz P-M, 1gb DDR2 533 worth of ram, 128mb x700, and 80gb 5200rpm hardrive. Wondering where i can get updated video drivers and if i need to do anything to my computer prior to instaling them. thank you.

 

Just ran 3DMarks05 and got 2535. still would like to know about the drivers since iam still running stock from compaq.

 

Thanks Mike, gotta download for winME til I get my laptop.

 

ATI Mobility Radeon 9600: 662

IBM Thinkpad T42
PM745 1.8Ghz
512MB DDR RAM
60GB 5400RPM HDD
ATI Mobility Radeon 9600

 

200M 64mb shared:

457 - stock drivers
499 - omega 6.1

Would be nice if I could increase that shared memory to at least 128mb. Sheesh.:gateway:

 

662 seems awfully low. I got 900+ at stock drivers, 1000+ on Omega, 1100+ if overclocked. Are you downclocked by any chance?

 

3150 - 3dMark05 256mb x700, omega drivers, mild overclock to 370core/380mem

not too shabby

 

That is kinda odd...most people are either blow the middle or above....no on with 3500-5000?

 

I just got my laptop a few days ago, so I haven't done anything with it. Could it possibly be that I had other apps running in the background? Or maybe that I undervolted my laptop?

EDIT - By the way, where could I find Omega drivers and would it be OK to install them even though I undervolted my laptop?

 

i guess thats just how the various cards turn out

x300's get below 1000, the x600's 1000-2000, the x700's 2000-3000, the x800's 5000+

exactly the same with the nvidia cards, seems there is a premium with the highest end card they have

 

You can get the Omega drivers at www.driverheaven.net, or at www.Omegadrivers.net.

Be sure to close all other apps when you run 3DMark, you want as much power as possible going to the benchmark.

 

Does "all other apps" include the stuff that runs on startup? IBM has a bunch of stuff that runs when the laptop starts up.

 

I just meant stuff you have open.

Shutting off some smaller services won't do much for your score.

 

Ok, thanks. I'll run another test shortly and hopefully my scores go up.


EDIT - Just finished another test and I got 666. I have a feeling it has something to do with me undervolting my laptop. Is it possible?

Also, Omega drivers + undervolt = OK? I know that overclock + undervolt = bad, so I wasn't sure about the Omega drivers, and what they do.

 

3826 3d Mark 05 Basic
Test 2-12-06
Stock Drivers, No overclocking

GT1 17.8 fps
GT2 10.8 fps
GT3 18.8 fps

CPU Score 5787
CPU Test 1 3.1 fps
CPU Test 2 4.8 fps

Super Pi 2M 1:15

Dell Inspiron E1705
T2500 2.0 GHz Centrino Duo
2 GB 667Mhz Memory
Nvidia 7800 Go 256 MB
WUXGA 1920 x 1200 Resolution
100 GB 5400 RPM
Windows XP Media Center Edition

I guess my scores are low for what I got. I mean I was beat by some 6800 cards. I'm hoping that some updated 7800 Go drivers will fix this problem.

 

Well, this thread inspried me to see just what this system could do

Using ATI Tool, the maximum stable clock speeds I found are 527/553 (up from 450/500 default) - I haven't played with just straight memory overclocking yet.

GT1 - Return To Proxycon 22.7 fps
GT2 - Firefly Forest 13.6 fps
GT3 - Canyon Flight 22.9 fps

CPU Test 1 2.6 fps
CPU Test 2 4.1 fps

3DMark Score 4807 3DMarks
CPU Score 4862 CPUMarks

Question: My hard drive seems to be thrashing during the CPU tests - anyone else noticed this?

 

The stock settings run was probably the "cleanest" I've done, as 3DMark was the first thing I installed and ran when the system was new. Now my system has got two version of SQL Server running, and a few other background services chewing up CPU all the time. Anyways, here 'tis:

3DMark Score 4161 3DMarks
CPU Score 4760 CPUMarks

Game Tests
GT1 - Return To Proxycon 20.0 fps
GT2 - Firefly Forest 11.5 fps
GT3 - Canyon Flight 20.0 fps

CPU Tests
CPU Test 1 2.5 fps
CPU Test 2 4.1 fps

Quick question: Are you able to publish your 3DM results online? When I submit mine it says "Unknown CPU" and "Generic VGA", so publishing isn't possible. It also detects my FSB as being 5771MHz

Haven't ever used Super Pi - got a link?

EDIT:

Downloaded Super PI and ran the 2M test -in 1m 19s. Note that I have continuous 2-3% CPU usage with all the background services I'm running though, so I wouldn't say my result is indicative of a "clean" 8204.

 

Better move my vote to the 5000+ category

3DMark Score 5174 3DMarks
CPU Score 5380 CPUMarks

Detailed Test Results
Game Tests
GT1 - Return To Proxycon 24.3 fps
GT2 - Firefly Forest 14.5 fps
GT3 - Canyon Flight 25.1 fps

CPU Tests
CPU Test 1 2.9 fps
CPU Test 2 4.4 fps

This is with the Catalyst 6.2 drivers, and a 529.88/558 overclock.

 

Great job with the overclocking, you certainly deserve a pat on the back! Over 5k . . amazing, that's beating the Mobility Radeon X800 by over eight hundred points!

 

Well, I don't know about a pat on the back, all I did was use an overclocking utility. Still, 5000 was a "mental target" (created by this thread no doubt), so I'm now happy until I get new silicon

 

Good job travel matey. I think I am going to try and break 4600 with my comp...specs in sig. I think I can do it, but who knows

I am the only one at 4500-5000 LOL!

 

The formula for 3DMark scores is:

(Game1 FPS * Game2 FPS * Game3 FPS) ^(1/3) * 250

So in order to get another 27 points, you should only need to gain about 0.002 FPS.. Doesn't sound like much, but when you're at the limit, you're at the limit!

 

Posted a couple weeks ago with a score of 666. Today I decided to use NHC on the Max Performance setting and run 3dMark05. Got a score of 887, which sounds a lot closer to what it should be stock. Yay for me...

 

2470 stock
2650 omega 6.2 drivers
344/330 clocks for both

128 mb x700 z70va

 

I have just taken delivery of my SavRow Blade-75 laptop:

http://www.savrow.com/Racing/blade-75 (silver with black screen - not that racing paint!)

It is a UK performance laptop company, (Sager i guess being its nearest equivalent in the US)

Intel Pentium M 2.0ghz
1GB DDR2 RAM
Nvidia Go 7800 GTX
100GB 7200rpm HDD


Stock Settings:

3D Mark 2005 -------> 7032 Marks


Woo! Any P-M laptop do better than that?

Now to install the games!

 

7800GTX's *do* kick!

In answer to your question though, here's the fastest one albeit a 2.4GHz P-M, but here's a 2.0GHz P-M that's doing pretty good too